away with all the tension we should not contain these people. they want to reward those who entered illegally with the daca people in that illegal program that was created by obama so when you talk about balancing ice and giving free medical care and giving them pathway to citizenship even though they violate our laws. mark: drivers licenses. and we will not detain you. when you start throwing this all out your enticing more people to come to this country illegally. here we have a president who is taking action to decrease 56% recently and they are throwing gas on the fire. rather than helping secure the border which is the top they want to keep enticing for people to come. in my opinion, there s it s about votes. that s why they don t want the citizenship questions on the census and is about power and electoral college and about their power.
away with all the tension we should not contain these people. they want to reward those who entered illegally with the daca people in that illegal program that was created by obama so when you talk about balancing ice and giving free medical care and giving them pathway to citizenship even though they violate our laws. mark: drivers licenses. and we will not detain you. when you start throwing this all out your enticing more people to come to this country illegally. here we have a president who is taking action to decrease 56% recently and they are throwing gas on the fire. rather than helping secure the border which is the top they want to keep enticing for people to come. in my opinion, there s it s about votes. that s why they don t want the citizenship questions on the census and is about power and electoral college and about their power. when i explained to them is not just about enforcing the law. this is about saving lives. if you care about these people
all requested records regarding the number of citizens and noncitizens in our country. they must furnish all legally accessible records in their possession immediately. trump made today s announcement after running into several legal road blocks. after he spoke, he asked his attorney general to back him up, which barr did. thank you, mr. president. congratulations on today s executive order. the supreme court correctly recognized that it would be entirely appropriate to include citizenship questions on the census. it nevertheless held that the commerce department did not adequately explain its decisions for doing so on the 2020 census. there is no question that a new decision to add the question would ultimately survive legal review. the problem is that any new decision would be subject to immediate challenge as a new
accessible records in their possession immediately. trump made today s announcement after running into several legal road blocks. after he spoke, he asked his attorney general to back him up, which barr did. thank you, mr. president. congratulations on today s executive order. the supreme court correctly recognized that it would be entirely appropriate to include citizenship questions on the census. it nevertheless held that the commerce department did not adequately explain its decisions for doing so on the 2020 census. there is no question that a new decision to add the question would ultimately survive legal review. the problem is that any new decision would be subject to immediate challenge as a new claim in the three ongoing district court cases. as a practical matter, the
accessible records in their possession immediately. now, trump made today s announcement after running into several legal road blocks. after he spoke, he asked his attorney general to back him up, which barr did. thank you, mr. president. congratulations on today s executive order. the supreme court correctly recognized that it would be entirely appropriate to include citizenship questions on the census. it nevertheless held that the commerce department did not adequately explain its decisions for doing so on the 2020 census. there is no question that a new decision to add the question would ultimately survive legal review. the problem is that any new decision would be subject to immediate challenge as a new claim in the three ongoing district court cases. as a practical matter, the supreme court s decision closed