A technical violation of the constitution, which is overthrowing the democratic process by which we elect the president, that is neither technical, nor is it legal. you know, this is you know, i understand that this defense du jour, they keep on threading things out to see what might stick to the public. but that one is beyond the pale. and it shouldn t be normalized. it is absolutely absurd. again, he will have his day in court. he will be able to float all of these not in the court of public opinion, but before judge chutkan, it is clear it will be rejected. but he will have his day in court like every defendant to raise all of this. but this is not a serious argument legally. neal, you have been leading the charge on cameras in the courtroom.
Share evidence, but they are still threatening. so, what can the judge actually do, especially mike pence, which reads like a clear threat, what can the judge do to stop that? so, jen, you know, it s worth noting that on thursday at the arraignment, donald trump under oath swore that he would not retaliate against, or threaten any potential witness. and then, the next day, that post and others, with respect to mike pence, were issued. so, what can the judge do? the judge can start by bringing parties in, and giving, you know, a sir sort of stern lecture, that this is an admonition that you have one more chance. the other thing the judge can do, remember, donald trump is out on bail. so, he is not free to say anything that anyone else would. there can be restrictions on what he did and what he can do.