Overcorrected and eisenhower was there with him. He thought that the end of colonial was a destructive hurricane. As we write the book and that helped lead to the disaster, the vietnam war, where francis was dealing with counterinsurgency for the better part of a decade since the end of World War Two. It go well. They make a lot of mistakes that the American Army will later repeat pretty frighteningly. And so by the time frank church is in the senate and he visits vietnam in 1962, its pretty clear that the saigon government is the us military has supporting and abetting them. Britain and france refused to help because there supposed to be a treaty. The geneva accords, that would have united vietnam through an election. Ho chi minh probably would have won was incredibly popular. He was a communist communists were killing rival groups. So there was already a civil war brewing. Think there was going to be blood . The united just made it worse. And thats so. Frank church visits vietnam in
He a member of the team that won the 22 pulitzer for explanatory for coverage of the september attacks. And then with a colleague he shared that 26 pulitzer for national for coverage of the nsa domestic spying program. Hes also written four books a about americas fight over abortion, about the cias final showdown with the kgb, about the cia and the george w bush, and about the costs, consequences of americas war on terror and first dozen years or so, after 911, currently his Senior National security correspondent for the intercept his son, tom its been a journalist for 15, 16 years. And hes worked for various news organizations covered and covered a wide of local and national topics, including National Security and u. S. Politics. His current focuses on in the last honest man, they look back at the life of former democratic senator frank of idaho, who was one of the most consequential lawmakers of the 20th century. He served in the from the late 1950s through the sixties and seventies
Welcome to politics prose im brad graham, the coowner of the bookstore along with my wife Lissa Muscatine and were very pleased to be hosting two ryzens here this evening we have veteran journalist jim and his son, journalist tom, and theyre here to talk about their new book the last man the cia the fbi, the mafia and the kennedys and one senators fight to save democracy. Our jim, of course, is a very accomplished investigative reporter, did some outstanding work with the new york times, where he was for for nearly 20 years from 1998 to 2017. He a member of the team that won the 22 pulitzer for explanatory for coverage of the september attacks. And then with a colleague he shared that 26 pulitzer for national for coverage of the nsa domestic spying program. Hes also written four books a about americas fight over abortion, about the cias final showdown with the kgb, about the cia and the george w bush, and about the costs, consequences of americas war on terror and first dozen years or
Two hours. Chief juste berts we will hear argument this morning in case 23726, moyle versus United States, and the consided case. Mr. Turner. Mr. Turner thank you, mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court when congress amended the medicare act in 1986, it put emtala on a centuries Old Foundation of state law. States have always been responsiblfolicensing doctors and setting the scope of their profeson practice. Indeed, emtala works precisely beuse states regulate the practice of medicine. And noinin emtala requires doctors to ignore the scope of their licensanoffer medical treatments that violate state la the statutory provisions make first, section 1395, the medicare acts eng provision, forbids the federal government from controlling the practice of meci. Thats the role of state regulation. Second, bdision f in emtala codifies a statutory presptn against preemption of state medical regulations. An third, emtalas stabilization provision is limited to available tremes, which depen
Two hours. Chief Justice Roberts we will hear argument this morning in case 23726, moyle versus united ates, and the consolidated case. Mr. Turner. Mr. Turner thank you,r. Hief justice, and may it please the court when congssmended the medicare act in 1986, it put emtala on a nties Old Foundation of state law. States have always bee responsible for licensing doctors and setting the scope of their professional practice. Indeed, emtala wksrecisely because states regulate the practice of medicine. And nothing in emtala requires doctors to ignore the scope of their license and offer medical treatments that violate state law. Three statutory provisions make th car. First, section 1395, the medicare acts opening provision, forbids theedal government from controlling the practice of medicine. Thats the role of state reguti. Second, subdivision f in emtala codifs statutory presumption against preemption of staical regulations. And, third, emtalas stabilization provision is mid to available tre