different players before, so security concerns, quite severe in this case, would be more comfortable with a scenario tried before. also fairly easy to anticipate the themes. president trump saying his charisma and kim jong-un s charis charisma that led to this moment, a de-escalation of the tension. as we look at what the next steps might be, we don t know, they re meeting south korean side. they normally prepare an agenda, do they not, for such high stakes meeting in terms of what will be accomplished or not? are normally doesn t really apply with president trump. president trump wanted to have this meeting. this meeting had been talked about and discussed and it had been in the rumor mill among
smart to lean into how hard it is. i know not to trust that poll that has me at the top. gravity will hit and i am not taking anything for granted and don t expect that i will have the support of everybody who supported me as vice president. i have to earn it. we like joe biden when he is an underdog and fighting back and the odds are against him. it s true for most politicians, but that would be his best shot. i think it is a really hard uphill battle for him. before i go, beto o rourke, did he have a good weekend, tough weekend, or should twitter shut up? i always think twitter should shut up, but chuck, this is something i think is important about beto. you can t buy, you can t coach charis charisma. he has it. i m not saying he has all the
of why? i get the logic is simple. every time you say interference it means i didn t win fair and square. i get it. the efforts to repeal previous and pre-existing sanctions of the kind that you mentioned and others. the logic isn t as continuous. why does the reporting suggest they re going so far to placate russ russia? white house officials would tell us that the president really believes if he could only have this relationship with vladimir putin that he covets, this bond. if he were only allowed to proceed, they could solve a lot of the world s problems, syria, iran and other really difficult and tractable issues. part is this conviction on the part of the president that his charis charisma, his personal ability to have relationships with leaders is the key to solving
questions because she is entitled. i think it would be good for her to be challenged by someone with charis charisma and brings thing do is the table. if it is all about legacy if that is the only thing, who is going to preserve his legacy the best. it will be joe biden. hillary clinton will tri triangulate. he comes up short of endorsing hillary clinton. and news channels are suggesting he is waiting for joe biden to throw hat in the ring and address him. or stay out of it. i don t think he wants to endorse either of them. sdwl how does this affect republicans? would they whether have joe biden or hillary clinton? i think republicans would rather have hillary clinton because she struggles. as i have been saying from the start this is someone who could
harry reid, the leader in the senate, the cure for common charis charisma, a man with the oratorical skills of the onstar operator. we are back. so when it comes to politics, comedian bill maher doesn t pull any punches. you might have noticed that if you watch his bo show. recently he s been thinking about how dysfunctional politics has become in the country and takes his message to red state america. harry smith caught up with him. reliably funny and liberal, bill bill maher has been mounting a one-man comedic insurgency around the country. i know everywhere there are smart, progressive, are ñsk7 free-thinking people.