Chapter 93a News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Chapter 93a. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Chapter 93a Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Where a defendant insurance company sent the plaintiff a letter reserving the insurer’s right to challenge the validity of a life insurance policy, the defendant did not engage in unfair or deceptive conduct despite continuing to send premium invoices and accepting premium payments after issuing the reservation of rights letter. “Sun Life Assurance Company of ....
Where defendants did not deliver face masks that the plaintiff paid for, double damages should be awarded under G.L.c. 93A because the defendants’ conduct was sufficiently intentional and callous such that multiple damages are justified. “Plaintiff FLTR, Inc. (‘FLTR’), is a Washington-based corporation that develops, manufactures, and sells personal protective equipment. . FLTR alleges that ....
A $312,000 jury award in a high-stakes trade secrets case may sound underwhelming. But that was before a federal judge piled on the damages following a bench trial on the plaintiff’s remaining claims in the bifurcated action. On April 25, U.S. District Court Judge Richard G. Stearns entered a total damage award of $5,061,444 in ....
A well-known grocery chain is facing a consumer class action brought by a Beverly resident who alleges that the brand-name baby and cleansing wipes he purchased aren’t nearly as “flushable” as advertised. The putative class action filed in U.S. District Court by plaintiff Mark Schotte on April 26 targets the Stop & Shop Supermarket Company ....
Where a plaintiff has alleged that the defendant, a former employee, violated her non-competition and non-disclosure agreements by going to work for a direct competitor after downloading and taking copies of proprietary, confidential and highly sensitive technical information, the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction despite the defendant’s argument that ....