Stay updated with breaking news from Celebrity lawyers. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Perhaps that the metropolitan police has decided it cannot take this any further, i don t think there was any particular expectation there was likely to be a criminal investigation or criminal prosecutions here in the united kingdom but within royal circles i think there will be continuing concern at what is taking place in the united states where the civil lawsuit of course is very much still taking place. we recall that prince andrew, shortly after stepping back from public life, said that he would fully cooperate with any legitimate investigation by the us authorities. to be candid, there has been very little public evidence of him doing that. his approach up to now appears to have been, let s just try to ignore it and hope it all goes away. this clearly is not going to go away in so far as the american action is concerned and there appears to have been a change in tactics now by prince andrew and his lawyers. american celebrity lawyers have been appointed and they are engaging with ....
Where the civil lawsuit of course is very much still taking place. we recall that prince andrew, shortly after stepping back from public life, said that he would fully cooperate with any legitimate investigation by the us authorities. to be candid, there has been very little public evidence of him doing that. his approach up to now appears to have been, let s just try to ignore it and hope it all goes away. this clearly is not going to go away, in so far as the american action is concerned, and there appears to have been a change in tactics now by prince andrew and his lawyers. american celebrity lawyers have been appointed and they are engaging with the civil lawsuit brought by virginia giuffre. we must remember that prince andrew has consistently and absolutely denied any impropriety and his family must be hoping that he can now finally establish his innocence. but it is a distraction ....
There appears to have been a change in tactics now by prince andrew and his lawyers. american celebrity lawyers have been appointed and they are engaging with the civil lawsuit brought by virginia giuffre. we must remember that prince andrew has consistently and absolutely denied any impropriety and his family must be hoping that he can now finally establish his innocence. but it is a distraction from other things, this is our top story this morning at a time when clarence house, for example, would be hoping we were paying more attention to the interview with the prince of wales about cop 26 and, broadly speaking, let s be honest, this is not a good position for a member of the british royalfamily to find position for a member of the british royal family to find themselves in. that is an understatement! thank you very much, nicholas witchell, our royal correspondent and we will hear from prince charles on the environment later in this half hour. ministers are coming under increasing pr ....
These uncorroborated and baseless allegations without knowing whether it s true or false, it s as lewdly reckless. celebrity lawyers who are jumping in front of cameras to repeat the stuff, he h absolutey has recourse. it s the only thing we can do in our system to make a claim. laura: yesterday he set up, i talked to someone in well that s the crime. it is not enough for a defamation case, could it be? it absolutely can be. we were falsely accusing anyone of a criminal act, for drugging something with the purpose of sexual assault, and if that was made recklessly, there is plenty of elements of recklessness and judge kavanaugh should absolutely keep those options on the table. but don t we have horrible laws in this country who are public figures who are malignedf ....
Uncorroborated and baseless allegations without knowing whether it s true or false. it is absolutely reckless. celebrity lawyers jumping in front of cameras to repeat this stuff, he absolutely has recourse. it s the only thing in our system is to pursue a defamation claim. laura: when of a avenatti comes out and says somebody kavanaugh drop quaaludes in a punch bowl. that s a crime. is that enough for a defamation case? at absently can be. you are falsely accusing someone of a criminal act, drugging someone for the purposes of sexual assault. if that statement was made recklessly and i certainly believe it was, there is elements of that certain of conduct that gives rise to a defamation claim. judge kavanaugh should keep those options on the table. laura: we have horrible laws in this country for public ....