are strangers that go in and ou it s hard to keep tabs on who s in there and who is not. with the cell towers the affidavit says this individual was in the area 12 prior times before the day of the murder. that s either him stocking the girls or someone in the house o he did know somebody in there and we will learn a lot more as that reporting comes on in the discover gets exchanged. another dna case. where is it that dna? is in the car? think about this, four people were stabbed through in that house. if he had transfers from blood coming out of that crime scene, it s inevitably going to be in that car and that the investigators will be able to get in. it could be in the apartment or a car or the family house. i think that s right. i think he was was definitely connected to the girls in the
two unrelated individuals is so small that it can be discounted. but the defense attorney wasn t rolling over for the state s dna case. jerry lynn burns is not guilty of the killing of michelle martino. the defense attorney went after the cops for the way they handled the evidence over four decades. he argued key items like michelle s dress were jumbled up with her other clothing, tainting them forever. when you opened up the original packaging of the dress, the panties and the panty hose, were the items all bundled together? as far as i recollect they were, yes. there was another reason to question the prosecution, the defense attorney said something called dna transfer. trace dna he quizzed his own expert witness. is it, dr. spence, a plausible explanation that the dna of jerry burns found on the
could only be long to one person. the probability of finding two unrelated and officials is so small, that they can be discounted. the defense attorney spies was rolling over for the state s dna case. jerry lynn burns is not guilty of the killing of michelle martinko. the defense attorney went after the cops for the way they handled the evidence over four decades. spies argued key items like michelle s dress were jumbled up with her other clothing, containing them forever. when you opened up the original packaging of the dress, the panties and the pantyhose, where the items all bundled together? as far as i recollect, they were, yes. and there was another reason to question the prosecutions, the defense attorney said. something called dna transfer. he quizzed his own expert witness. is it, doctor spends, a
demanding yes so on i wanted to strengthen my personality i wanted to show that i m a real man and many only wanted that love and in public it was presented differently i was the big macho at least two or three girls at night but it was a nice time anyway great to have i seen it said lots of the. forty thousand made the six dead on the a for erica has been removed to turn it to eric. organized. this to take him up up the. east gate after strawson when i m walking on the street and if someone shouts behind me erica i can t control myself that quickly and turn around erica as a part of. i did the c d n a case by me yet even though. it she is a three time grandfather and married for the second time he only had surgery at the
sentenced that man to life in prison for that rape, but the maryland court of appeals later threw out othe conviction on constitutional grounds. shannon bream live in washington. how significant is today s d.n.a. case? well, shepard, today just alito called it potentially the most important criminal procedure case before the supreme court in decades. this case was out of maryland where alonzo king was arrested for assault back in 2009. that day, a d.n.a. swab was taken from his cheek ultimately linked him to that unsolved rape and he was convicted that conviction was thrown out. the appeals court said that swab was illegal search and seizure in violation of the fourth amendment. today a number of the justices expressed concerns about the privacy implications of taking d.n.a. from someone who has been arrested but not convicted. it could be completely innocent. but others asked how is taking d.n.a. any different than a fingerprint and that kind of evidence has repeatedly been upheld b