two unrelated individuals is so small that it can be discounted. but the defense attorney wasn t rolling over for the state s dna case. jerry lynn burns is not guilty of the killing of michelle martino. the defense attorney went after the cops for the way they handled the evidence over four decades. he argued key items like michelle s dress were jumbled up with her other clothing, tainting them forever. when you opened up the original packaging of the dress, the panties and the panty hose, were the items all bundled together? as far as i recollect they were, yes. there was another reason to question the prosecution, the defense attorney said something called dna transfer. trace dna he quizzed his own expert witness. is it, dr. spence, a plausible explanation that the dna of jerry burns found on the