we know that s one of the reasons why he s on the supreme court. i think this is tantamount to sticking a dagger in our back. we will gun to see a kind of segregated higher education landscape. we re going to see that become wider and wider. what s next, gay marriagesome. is this leading to no women in colleges soon? who knows? [laughter] no women in colleges. we can dream. i joke. [laughter] and biden wasn t done sobbing, running over to the safe pace of msnbc. i find it just so out of sorts with the basic value system of the american people. do you to worry that that without court reform this conservative majority is too young and too conservative, that they might do too much harm? i think they may do too much harm. i think that some of the court are beginning to the realize their legitimacy is being questioned in ways that it hasn t been questioned e in the past. he ended that interview the only way he knows how, but with by awkwardly shuffling off th
court ruling that didn t go his way. top court dealing with affirmative action. that means merit agains and the media will need a fainting couch. the worst thing about affirmative action is that it created a clarence thomas. clarence thomas has criticized affirmative action and we know that s why he s on the supreme court. i think this is sticking dag dag dager in our back. we will see that segregation become wider and wider. what s next, gay marriage? is this leading to no women in colleges soon? who knows. no women in college. we can dream. i joke. biden wasn t done sobbing running over to the safe space of msnbc. find it so out of sorts with the basic value system of the american people. do you worry without court reform this conservative majority is too young and too conservative that they might do too much harm? i think they may do too much harm. ink some of the court are beginning to realize their legitimacy is being questioned in ways it had not bee
for the first time yesterday and was like, what? it s been a while since the supreme court treated the constitution as anything but a paper towel for when biden. america banned slavery. here is an interesting fact that folks at reuters just dug up, i love reuters. powerful people in the u.s., supreme court justices, governors and legislatures descended from slave owners, including republican mitch mcconnell. i d say he took one on the chin, we all know that is not possible. [laughter] greg: lindsey graham, langford and tom cotton. cotton, his name gave that away. if he ran for president, he should use the slogan picked cotton. not going to work in the cities. [laughter] greg: i m sorry. i would not advise that either. greg: if old white men did not surprise you, how about dems, duckworth, sheehen, liz warren and maggie. liz warren must be asking how, how. how is this possible? fun part, every living president is descendent of slave owners, except one. can you guess wh
we start this morning on fox & friends with brand new developments in the jeffrey epstein document dump. there s been another one. ainsley: last night another 300 documents were unsealed putting more scrutiny on former president bill clinton. brian: we are learning more about the holiday stars who were in epstein s orbit and we expect more documents to come out later today. brooke singman all over this in the green room with her lab top out. tell me the latest. that s right. more than 300 additional pages have been unsealed and expecting even more today. one of the big takeaways from last night s release with is a claim about former president bill clinton. virginia giuffre walked about good friend. did he not respond with a statement but instead pointed us to this telegraph article that says, quote, there is no evidence to support the claims and they were strenuously denied by a representative for vanity fair s long time former editor graden carter who told the tele
starting with just weeks to go until the start of the 2024 presidential race. gop frontrunner donald trump just scored a major legal victory against special counsel jack smith in that the supreme court issued a one-sentence judgment yesterday bluntly rejecting smith s request to fast track arguments on the former president s immunity case. so what comes next? evan perez breaks it down. reporter: the u.s. supreme court rejected a request by federal prosecutors to skip the appellate court and have the high court decide whether donald trump has immunity from prosecution in the election subversion charges. the decision deals a significant blow to special counsel jack smith s effort to keep a march 4th trial date on track. that s a lot harder now that prosecutors will have to wait several weeks while the d.c. court of appeals weighs the same questions. trump argues he has immunity. he also claims because he was impeached by the house of representatives and acquitted by the senat