peaceful solutions to the world s problems. tough talk and bluster may be the easy thing to do politically, but it s not the right thing for our security. but will the deal halt iran s nuclear ambitions? we ll discuss that and the growing confrontation with china with former cia and nsa director, general michael hayden. and our power player of the week this holiday season is not your typical turkey farmer. i m really happiest when i m engaged in working and thinking and striving. all, right now, on fox news sunday. and hello again from fox news in washington. the president promised by the end of november, the problems plaguing healthcare.gov would be fixed. and a new administration report released this morning cites, quote, dramatic progress. but does that mean the web site to enroll in obamacare is fully functional? and what about the larger program? we ll have a fair and balanced debate between two experts in a moment. but, first, we turn to fox news correspondent
34-year period of hell. the polling in the united states shows that 2-1, people favor this, and if it doesn t work, favor enhanced sanctions. so i think if we are adroit, and i think john kerry has been very adroit, along with the world, catherine ashman and others, we will insist on much tougher benchmarks, and we will end up in a place where iran has civil nuclear capabilities, but no more any near time chance of a weaponized nuclear program. george, i know, when we talked last week, when the deal was just first announced, you were very skeptical. but what about this argument that you hear from congresswoman harman and from general hayden, let s give it six months, and let s see where we are at the end of the six months? and obviously you re not just waiting, you re negotiating during that whole time. look, understand, all our choices are terrible. and if we wind up with them a screwdriver s turn away from weaponization, we should consider ourselves
34-year period of hell. the polling in the united states shows that 2-1, people favor this, and if it doesn t work, favor enhanced sanctions. so i think if we are adroit, and i think john kerry has been very adroit, along with the world, catherine ashman and others, we will insist on much tougher benchmarks, and we will end up in a place where iran has civil nuclear capabilities, but no more any near time chance of a weaponized nuclear program. george, i know, when we talked last week, when the deal was just first announced, you were very skeptical. but what about this argument that you hear from congresswoman harman and from general hayden, let s give it six months, and let s see where we are at the end of the six months? and obviously you re not just waiting, you re negotiating during that whole time. look, understand, all our choices are terrible. and if we wind up with them a screwdriver s turn away from weaponization, we should consider ourselves
0 twitter, on our home page, fox news.com/media buzz and also on our facebook website. hope you ll give us a like. i m chris wallace. the obama administration says it met its deadline to fix healthcare.gov. but it is also telling people there is no rush to sign up. as more enrollment deadlines are pushed back, is the website the least of obamacare s problems? we ll ask two health care experts on opposite sides of the debate, james capretta and neera tanden. plus, our sunday panel weighs in on white house efforts to lower expectations for obamacare s online relaunch. then, skepticism over last week s deal with iran that president obama is calling a victory for diplomacy. we cannot rule out peaceful solutions to the world s problems. tough talk and bluster may be the easy thing to do politically, but it s not the right thing for our security. but will the deal halt iran s nuclear ambitions? we ll discuss that and the growing confrontation with china with former cia and nsa direct
0 about the question of cancellations, because as i say, this is not a web site problem. it s a lot of problems that have to be fixed. there has been so much attention to the millions of individual policyholders who have had their policies canceled. let s put this up on the screen. in the first month, for every one person that got insurance, 50 people lost coverage. but it now turns out millions more will lose employer policies. back in 2010, the administration projected about 14 million people who now get health insurance through their jobs will lose that by 2019. other government estimates are even worse. neera, hasn t the president misled all of us about the possibility that we could lose the plans we have? so, first of all, on these, i haven t seen these estimates of 14 million people from employer-based that was from cms. that was a higher coverage. cbo has done projections since then. they are much lower than that. so, i think i think we can really find the facts on the