Oh the new one well bring out the dogs. Mush dogs barking the old ones just fine well do anything, seriously anything, to help our customers. Thanks. Ally. Do it right. Tonight, they prepare to go before congress and the country. No matter what happens this moment will change our nations politics. Later on, roz roderosenstein. Was he being sarcastic. First, negotiation after negotiation. Shifting the Judiciary Committee on thursday at 10 00 a. M. I, of course, will be there too. Some of the details about this hearing have been worked out. The hearing will be open and dr. Ford will testify first. Democratic senators will ask questions. But important factors are so far unresolved. Like how much time will be allowed for those questions. And then theres the matter of whether republican senators themselves or perhaps their staffers or an outside counsel will do the questioning. This is important in part because all the republicans on the committee are men. At the same time, judge kavanaugh
The coming testimony of dr. christine blasey ford and brett kavanaugh invited comparisons to the anita hill/clarence thomas hearings. both a knit hill and dr. ford are professors. they both initially resisted going public or being identified before ultimately doing so at the 11th hour. both also drew categorical denials from the supreme court nominees that they spoke out against and both of those nominees also had presidents who were willing to strongly defend them. this decent and honorable man has been smeared. this is not a man that deserves this. he will be confirmed. and in the end, he will get his good name back. he is such an outstanding man, very hard for me to imagine
Information from michael page and the reason that they used the michael isikoff report is that he is carter page is making denials and they are false. he tells judy woodruff in 2017 that he had no meetings with the rushl shan officials in 2016 and he has testified in front of the house intelligence committee he had a deputy meeting with the prime minister of rush sharks and he is admitting that he has met the russian ambassador and admits to have met the russian deputy on the moscow trip as well as the december trip, a and that sin for nation the fbi would be providing the judges in addition to information from the wiretaps and the strange categorical denials and the false denials, and they would wanted to know what he is hid g hiding, so it is appropriate to investigate him and keep it going as long as they believe it is useful and the judges believe it is useful. ryan and james, thank you for your expertise here. we appreciate that. and now, president trump s
So that s his other point that he makes that he got wrong as evidence of not really having advance knowledge. there s a lot of information nobody else had at that point, and it s so kind of circular. as van says, lies and lies and lies. julian assange did come out on june 16th, i think, on itv and say, i ve got e-mails of hillary clinton. we re going to be dumping, and it s going to be really huge. so roger stone doesn t actually start publicly talking about e-mails or anything from wikileaks until about a month after julian assange has already come forward, which surprised me when i was doing the research. but with a level of specificity that could be completely made up, right, or not, right? the level of specificity, i think very few other people had or were talking about. and, again, notwithstanding all this categorical denials, he was in communication with them. now, the communication is like a little bit of like bug off, buddy, or you re not helping us. but there was communi
And it s so kind of circular. as van says, lies and lies and lies. julian assange did come out on june 16th, i think, on itv and say, i ve got e-mails of hillary clinton. we re going to be dumping, and it s going to be really huge. so roger stone doesn t actually start publicly talking about e-mails or anything from wikileaks until about a month after julian assange has already come forward, which surprised me when i was doing the research. but with a level of specificity that could be completely made up, right, or not, right? the level of specificity, i think very few other people had or were talking about. and, again, notwithstanding all this categorical denials, he was in communication with them. now, the communication is like a little bit of like bug off, buddy, or you re not helping us. but there was communication. and that and the date, i just think if we really pick through this interview, which now i don t want to do because i m just going to think about van s parrot, there