Live Breaking News & Updates on Casey Asa

0 decisis analysis and i want to give you an opportunity to respond. the undue burden test is not at issue. that applies to regulations, not prohibitions. the state has conceded this is a prohibition. thats the title of this law is an act to prohibit abortion after 15 weeks and the only thing that is at issue in this case is the viability line. the viability line has been workable. the lower federal courts have applied it uniformly for 50 years, the fifth circuit had no difficulty striking down this law unanimously 3-0. it has been an exceedingly workable standard. if i may return to your question, a reasonable possibility standard would not be workable. it would boil down to an argument that states can prohibit a category of women from exercising their constitutional right merely because of the number of people in the category and that is not how constitutional rights work. a state would never say it could ban religious services on a wednesday evening for example because most people ....

United States , Casey Asa , Harry Blackman , Harris Faulkner , Jonathan Turley , Ohio State , Wasnt The Issue , Undue Burden Test , Viability Line , Fifth Circuit , Difficulty Striking , Hype Thetically The Court , Chief Justice , Undue Burden Standard , Viability It Wouldn T , Reaffirming Roe , Equivalent Of Overrule Casey , In Casey What Hadn T , Liberty Interest , Isn T , Doesnt Change , Doesn T , Philosophical Differences Couldn T , Stare Decisis , Justice Breyer , Jon Roe ,