good afternoon. i heard that karine jean-pierre, the spokes woman at the white house says she doesn t know what title 42 will look like when it lifts may 11th. let me help and give you an idea. we re here at ground zero at camp monument in brownsville. there s over 2,000 migrants a day coming to this location. nearly 15,000 in the week i ve been here. they re getting better at screening, processing and transporting these migrants out. that is the problem that we re dealing with now. this is the calm before the storm. it s already overwhelming agents on the ground. let me show you also some of the humanitarian crisis. we can show you video. the migrants are in the water on flotation devices. many struggling with trying to deal with the river. some of them can t swim. that s why you have border patrol agents along with texas dps and texas national guard down on the river literally saving lives around the clock as well. we talk though to some brownsville residents, neil. the
reply, is that the number is published by hamas are not only inflated they include the number of terrorists combatant death, every one civilian death, and every civilian deaths, by the way, is a tragedy is one civilian deaths, too many but compared to any other modern conflict, including the united states involvement in iraq, afghanistan, and syria, where the ratio was a for civilians to every combatant debt or nine civilians, 30 combatant. that that is a record that s not been matched by any other army in history including the united states military. so we re going to have an issue with the vitamin striation about those numbers but at base, i think the goals of the war remained unchanged, destroying hamas, assuring that over seventh can happen again i think we should point out that the white house has assessed that those numbers historically have been fairly accurate coming from the palestinian ministry of health. nevertheless about us ambassador michael oren, we have to l
the plaintiffs argued that the musical cords and the melodies of sheer han s thinking out loud copied portions of let s get it on. the jurors rejected that argument. they decided in favor of sh sherran. this trial captivated the attention of the music industry, re-ignited conversations about protecting artistic work. it follows the 2015 victory by marvin gaye s family in another copyright action that was against robin thicke and pharrell williams. that case jurors decided that robin thicke s song blurred lines copied parts of marvin gaye s got to give it up. sounded too much along.
guy signing the checks for a swanky apartment off the books they weren t paying taxes on. definitely i think a strong case and a case jurors would not like if he ended up going to trial because a wealthy person not paying his fair share i think often doesn t go well with jurors. let s high height lowes numbers for a moment because, very quickly, some people say this is just how business is done. no big deal. but let s put them up on screen, the amount of taxes that were evaded allegedly. more than half a million dollars. that s just the federal taxes. about 250,000 more in state and local taxes. that s a lot of money. his lawyers, interestingly, didn t seem to challenge the allegation itself, but rather seemed to make a case that, hey, this is how business is done in new york. a lot of businesses do this with what they re calling perks here
way. she was grandstanding. in listening to her last night, she didn t know the law. she was trying to justify what was a bad decision. i think she used this case as political cover because she has her own problems in the african-american community back in jacksonville. philip, i think it would help people today to hear from the jurors and what their rational was and what their deliberations were like. they can choose to stay anonymous. the judge gave them anonymity through this. we don t know their names and addresses obviously. do you think any of them will ever come forward? that s a good question. normally in a high-profile case jurors want to come forward, because they like the limelight and want to explain it to the media. that being said, in this case unlikely for the jury to come forward. they did such a good job making sure they were anonymous, they don t want backlash because of the acquittal. for that reason it would be