Stay updated with breaking news from Case authority. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
you almost never see it. or here. you re gonna be explaining all of that later in the hour, because that is how e. jean carroll one again today. collateral a stop. all i m writing it down, and i can t wait for the definition you spell at the way it sounds. nothing to it. today, the georgia 19 became the georgia two and the georgia 17 at least for now. it was a good day for digit tierney fani willis and her team of lawyers who won round one of what will be the fully televised trials of the georgia 19. to donald trump s codefendants in georgia were in court today through their lawyers asserting their right to a speedy trial which is now scheduled for october 23rd. they were asking the judge to sever their speedy trials from each other so that they could be tried separately and speedily. judge scott mcafee ruling from the bench in realtime on live television, denied the defense request to sever their trials and ordered the two defendants, both lawyers, sydney powel ....
which is now scheduled for october 23rd. they were asking the judge to sever their speedy trials from each other so that they could be tried separately and speedily. judge scott mcafee ruling from the bench in realtime on live television, denied the defense request to sever their trials and ordered the two defendants, both lawyers, sydney powell and kenneth chesebro, to go to trial together. if any other defendants demand a speedy trial, they will probably be added as defendants in these speedy trial a defendant powell and defendant chesebro, and depending on exactly they when they asked for a speedy trial. the prosecution will today that they will call, quote, in excess of 150 witnesses, in a trial they estimate will last 120 days, not including jury selection. one of the reasons the prosecution convince the judge not to sever individual defendants for individual trials today is that according to the prosecution, quote, all of the evidence is admissible against all of ....
somebody caught in the middle of it, and that does not excuse the person from the consequences. professors, we have talked about abuse of power and bribery when we started, we said we would also discuss obstruction of congress. so i would like to ask you some questions about obstruction of congress. professor gerhardt, in your view, is there enough evidence here to charge president trump with a high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of congress? i think that there is more than enough. as i mentioned in my statement, i just really underscore this. the third article of impeachment, approved by the house judiciary committee against president nixon charged him with misconduct that he failed to comply with four legislative subpoenas. this is far more than four that this president has failed to comply with. and he has ordered the executive branch, as well, not to cooperate with congress. those together with a lot of other evidence suggests obstruction of congress. professor ....
robbery that s burglary, i ll get it right. and in this situation you ve got somebody really caught in the middle of it, and that doesn t excuse the person from the consequences. professors, we ve talked about abuse of power and bribery. when we started we said we would also discuss obstruction of congress. so i would like to ask you some questions about obstruction of congress. professor gerhardt, in your view, is there enough evidence here to charge president trump with the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of congress? i think there s more than enough. as i mentioned in my statement, just to really underscore this, the third article of impeachment approved by the house judiciary committee against president nixon charged him with misconduct because he had failed to comply with four legislative subpoenas. here it is far more than four that this president has failed to comply with. and he has ordered the executive branch as well not to cooperate with congress. th ....
somebody really caught in the middle of it, and that doesn t excuse the person from the consequences. professors, we ve talked about abuse of power and bribery. when we started, we said we would also discuss obstruction of congress. so i d like to ask you some questions about obstruction of congress. professor gerhardt, in your view, is there enough evidence here to charge president trump with the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of congress? i think there s more than enough. as i mention in my statement, just to really underscore this, the third article of impeachment approved by the house judiciary committee against president nixon charged him with misconduct because he failed to comply with four legislative subpoenas. here it is far more than four that this president has failed to comply with and he s ordered the executive branch as well not to cooperate the congress. those together with a lot of other evidence suggests obstruction of congress. professor karl ....