Probably non conforming uses. In terms of creating new non conforming uses there is none of that but a good one is the creation of pdr in bay view as well as other examples. I think the notice is just important because we get people at the last minute that who didnt realize this was going on because they didnt get a legal notice and people dont see things until theyre in front of their faces anyway, and i guess the other question about the notification. Okay. Now youre going to have legal non conforming uses and some knew that but they were allowed to exist. Is there like the eastern neighborhoods some amnecessity or process by which you are doing letters of determination . What is the process if youre existing legal non conforping office use and now were going to be zoning you in the sallies and making you permanently non conforming what do say they want add more office space what do they do . Sure. Anybody already a legal non conforming use and remain that way things basically stay t
Commission president fong. Aye. That passes unanimously. Next is case 14 at 2001 3rd street. Request for conditional use theoriesation. Good afternoon commissioners. I am michelle from the planning staff. This is a conditional use permit from at t to install a facility at 200130 and at mariposa and 3rd street. At t proposes instillation up to nine an tenss and mounted on the screen and match the existing building and minimally visible and there is one on the northwest corner that will be removed as part of this project this is preferred location site. Staff received 25 emails and opposed to the project based on health concerns. Impact on the property and visibility of the project and blocked views and request for additional information. In response to that at t arranged a another meeting this week and give information on the proposed project. Staff has received four letters in support of the project and i am available for questions if needed. Thank you. Project sponsor. Good afternoon
This 11th street corridor and i earlier stated my preference for what i believe is wmuo which is option 3b and one of the reasons it would also allow office and presumably allow retail in that area which contributes to day time uses that would help the vitality of the area because if you have a lot of entertainment uses typically clubs they dont come into play until late at night and allowing some office and retail and day time commercial things would keep the district moving throughout the day too. We had a discussion while we were having a break there on the gas lamp in san diego and im not trying to hint this is what were looking to create here but they do have an area where a concentration of dining establishments and some clubs are easily walkable because you often have to be cabbing from one part of San Francisco to another to go to different scplais and we have a lot of walkable areas and like san diego there are few walkable areas and why its concentrated there. The other quest
There. The other question i had and somebody brought this up. Is there any call for metering and housing . I think we may have asked that last week and i was assured there wasnt but somebody brought that up. In the plan, in the area plan that would be adopted in the general plan there is a policy that says that we should establish a Community Stabilization policy that attempts i am paraphrasing and Affordable Housing afford and jobs and its about that balance. Separate from the plan the task force adopted a specific policy and mechanisms how you would achieve that goal and that included what people call metering which is essentially if the area fell out of balance then market rate housing is held up until that balance is restored either through publicly developed Affordable Housing or higher amounts of Affordable Housing in the private projects. That specific policy is not part of the planning code amendments that are in front of you now. That is pulled out separate and that whole issu
Come into play until late at night and allowing some office and retail and day time commercial things would keep the district moving throughout the day too. We had a discussion while we were having a break there on the gas lamp in san diego and im not trying to hint this is what were looking to create here but they do have an area where a concentration of dining establishments and some clubs are easily walkable because you often have to be cabbing from one part of San Francisco to another to go to different scplais and we have a lot of walkable areas and like san diego there are few walkable areas and why its concentrated there. The other question i had and somebody brought this up. Is there any call for metering and housing . I think we may have asked that last week and i was assured there wasnt but somebody brought that up. In the plan, in the area plan that would be adopted in the general plan there is a policy that says that we should establish a Community Stabilization policy that