am a 13 resident on crt line drive in material put by the project sponsor, and reviewing some of the notes from november 13th, i have two questions. things that we wanted to consider not necessarily directly related to the questions of open space, but in housing need. i found no questions in regarding housing need either with the san francisco plan or here in the twin peaks portion of the san francisco plan. and i just see this project as being unnecessary. you have a four bedroom, town house on the top, and i just wondered what family can afford in san francisco a four bedroom house, where a two bedroom in twin peaks rents for 2500 a month and i did not see a reference whether they will be for sailor for rent that is not specified and i saw no assessment and no metrics to indicate that this housing project was of need to anyone and so i questioned why is it necessary? to put this project here? or any other project of that type. thank you. thank you. next speaker, please?
time. i have a question, if the contractor were to start building what would be the action. if they started to building? correct. stop work order. probably a fine. for that. you know? it is not advisable. you don t see it very often. sow it would not be good. they don t have any structural drawings to build off. okay. so they would not get very far. they could excavate and could not poor any foundations they would be working without a permit in essence. okay, thank you. okay, we are going to take public comment, but before anyone gets up i just want to make clear that this was an appeal filed by an association and under the board s rules that means that anyone who is a member of the governing board or an officer of the association should not speak under public comment, their time to speak is with the party, okay? so anyone who is not one of those people who would like to speak, please raise your hand. okay, we are going to do the same process we did be
and these pictures that they are showing are deceptive pictures and i think that you should go there and take a look at the property and that will give you a clear picture of what is going on. next speaker. hello, i m john, and i am the other owner of 74 crest line. and i have lived there since 1985 in one of the apartments as my business parter has lived in an apartment since 1985. besides all of the loss of the green space, park and congestion and all of that i am concerned about wind damage. we had a lot of wind damage and it blew our siding off and the $100,000 job, but we just did my partner was talking about the wall. it is the exterior wall against next to the public staircase. at any rate, if a building goes in there, we are going to have even a stronger wind tunnel through there, and i am concerned about that also for my plants and i have replanted and i am also concerned about that too because the loss of the sunlight. i hate to see the loss of that and as my bu
that was in the planning department a woman named bruce chafy and i worked with her and i it was in the open spaces that were on the private land that would to be maintained and open for the public open space and they were to be maintained by someone entity and now unfortunately back in those days the planning department was not as sophisticated as this today or the city itself in record things. so the only thing that actually got recorded was a subdivision map itself which references the landscaping map, was to be on file if the sfaoe and the planning department since that time. most of the departments have moved several times and the records have been misplaced somewhere. i have a feeling that maybe they can be found yet. but they have not had a chance to do it and as the president, mentioned, maybe that likely there is a discussion of the item in the minutes of the planning commission if we could establish when it was before the planning commission. there is also a likelih
quite a number of residential subdivisions with the single family and multiple family areas and the planning commission reviewed those for our consistency and it was our master plan policies along with checking with the zoning that was in effect that did not recently been approved in 1960. and so this project had and the thing that the departments measure input on these subdivisions was looking at the open spaces that were provided in the landscaping treatment. and it did readily, little look at the bidding forms themselves and other than that it was within the density of them and it was in the other and they were not even the right and at that time so there was very little from that aspect. the project and the other (inaudible) there were two subdivisions and out of a very lengthy review by a planning that was in the planning department a woman named bruce chafy and i worked with her and i it was in the open spaces that were on the private land that would to be maintained an