good afternoon, everyone and welcome to the tuesday, november 15, 2016, meeting of the san francisco board of supervisors mr. clerk call the roll. thank you madam president supervisor avalos supervisor president london breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar not present supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor wiener not present supervisor yee, supervisor yee not present madam president we have quorum. thank you ladies and gentlemen, please join us of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. thank you, madam clerk any communications. yes. madam president we re in resident of two communications the first from supervisor wiener and supervisor yee dated november 1st and 14 con seismically both supervisors will be absent and requests the board excuse them from the meeting and okay. colleagues a motion t
you ever say enough how many of us and the businesses we frequent will be forcefully pushed out by your inaction yesterday at our you think it s gathering you said san francisco will remain a sanctuary city if you keep up this not much places for people to afford you stress the importance of being inclusive north yet approve projects conflicting for the well-off i understand this is what you re used to for the projects meet the crepe you ll pass that that is not working look at the situation outside people can t afford to live here people are suffering all you do is allow the luxury vemdz developments in the city this need to stop today (clapping.) thank you. next speaker, please. sir before the next speaker i ll remind the public applause is prohibited by the board rules you re welcome to use the supportive fingers thank you. thank you. i m terry i m a member of the sro collaborative he oppose the intent task mess on south van ness and like to say we need more af
you ever say enough how many of us and the businesses we frequent will be forcefully pushed out by your inaction yesterday at our you think it s gathering you said san francisco will remain a sanctuary city if you keep up this not much places for people to afford you stress the importance of being inclusive north yet approve projects conflicting for the well-off i understand this is what you re used to for the projects meet the crepe you ll pass that that is not working look at the situation outside people can t afford to live here people are suffering all you do is allow the luxury vemdz developments in the city this need to stop today (clapping.) thank you. next speaker, please. sir before the next speaker i ll remind the public applause is prohibited by the board rules you re welcome to use the supportive fingers thank you. thank you. i m terry i m a member of the sro collaborative he oppose the intent task mess on south van ness and like to say we need more af
sponsored that development over and over again and saying we committing to high levels of affordable housing i m not just depending on a positive optimistic outcome into the future but guarantee with the market-rate. i don t - the redevelopment agreement didn t have triggers we stop or pause with the open agreements in the way the agreement was structured tmc hats the infrastructure to move forward in the city to have the obligation to delivery the affordable housing subject to 9 financial structure that was included isn t financing plan. okay. so the plan didn t include any conditions that will stop or reopen the terms of the agreement. if i may add supervisor another schufrn of the funding solution involves the local share participation what we ve tried dpa make a commitment at that level but allow us opportunity to get a consensus how we should work with the board and the mayor to think through strategic upstairs steps without over burdening the general fund in way
10 percent middle-class and 10 person working-class in a cultural district are hugely gentrifying he want to point out a couple of things to send this back for the full eir number one let s work back if 2018 a question the community if raise during the bryant street appeal when do we cap that mess 2018 we ll overrun with physical building the highest end of the eastern neighborhoods scope we ll physically pass it at this point what will you do build from 2018 to 2034 is that we re heated but ceqa the reason ceqa says the probably foreseeable future and ask you whether to exempt you re not expected to without studying new mitigations on the updated plan that is highlighted we don t want to blow over the line we re at this hundred unit i want to tell you a curious story that is we re at 24 hundred unit when the community presented this to bryant street in july new numbers were realized we ve added hundreds of units not pipeline earth have driven the number not from 24 to 27, on