i have a question the city didn t pass any regulations state law about apply didn t has nothing to do with the city didn t pass regulatory scombrooen i what is look like please clarify hue how do you do that? let s say this is a a city and county so san francisco. yeah. san francisco. give us san francisco how how do you do that? what are the time elements and like we should be expecting what is the city explain to us where we are in the process in the city and county of san francisco and to what extent you said. yeah. equip the home cultivation. not what the city will do i mean first of all, to clarify i don t think the state is just a default law the state regulates throughout the state and have to have a state license you have a local license or even a local city of san francisco license businesses has to have a state of california license and comply with the state reservation my understanding and you might know san francisco will come up with a license to lice
what we did versus county that will be live data. a district will be very personally speaking about their data and that is not what we proposed in november. thank you, sandra. i appreciate the feedback. madam chair, i forget the exact order, but i have the motion if you are ready, but don t want to rush it. okay. but josh has completed his presentation on item 7. it is an action item. i m happy to entertain a motion. mic please. i authorize the director contract authorization for regional lead county office of education in attachment 2. second. it s been seconded. all in favor say, aye . aye. any opposed? motion carries. okay, item 8. josh. [inaudible] [inaudible] this is the implementation of the pd plan. as i mentioned before we have 28 adopted plx. some have facilitators, some co-facilitators. we have 40 facilitators that requires three plx coaches, 13 facilitators per plx. two have been approved. we are very excited about those two individuals. we nee
afternoon. welcome to our special budget and finance committee meeting of monday december 5, 2016. i m katy and chair thg team and to my left is normal yee. our clerk is linda wong and sfgovtv like to thank leo [inaudible] derek. please silence cell phones and electronic devices. complete speaker cards and document to be included as part of the file should be submit today the clerk. thank you. today we have item 1, so if you can please call item 1. orbd nons approving and authorizing the exectv director of port of san francisco to execute project agreement with army corp of engineering to allow dredging of central basin by pier 70, not to exceed $2.2 million for project cost and port providing a 10 percent matching share nod to exceed $900,000 of the central basin payable over the 30 years for matching fair from the port not to exceed $3.1 million. thank you we have the port staff here to explain why we are here on a monday for the item. yes. good afternoon supervis
september 16, 2014, city of san francisco city council meeting. board of supervisors please stand by. [ gavel ] good afternoon, welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors meeting of tuesday, september 16, 2014. madam clerk, please call the roll. city clerk: yes. supervisors avalos, present, breed, present, campos, presents, president chiu, present, supervisors cohen, pre, ferrell, present, kim, present, mar present, tang present, supervisor wiener, pre, yee present. mr. president, all members are present. thank you. please join us in the pledge of allegiance. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. madam clerk, do we have any communication? there is no communications today, mr. president. if you can go to our special order. the policy discussion between the honorable mayor edwin lee and board of supervi
order to provide cellular and data services to our passenger and their customers. and these, leases were all approved in 2009. by the board, and since that time, the companies have all substantially increased and upgraded their infrastructure at the airport, and this five-year extension to this lease will help t-mobile ammortize some of those costs and the board also approved identical extensions for the other three wireless companies in april of 2012, and t-mobile had not requested to be part of this extension, until march of this year and so the resolution would require retroto july of 2014. any questions? seeing, none, mr. rose could we go to your report? yes, on page 13 of our report, we report that the t-mobile will pay the airport, 475,000, for the leased pay, from july 1, 2014, to june, 30, 2015 and then in the subsequent four years, the rent will increase by 25,000 per year, and total amount paid to the airport of $2,625,000 for the period of july first, to june