Says that the president has the First Amendment right to speech. Yes. Even the First Amendment right to lie. Absolutely. This indictment is criminalizing conduct not speech. Its criminalizing speech. Why the randomly incised judge is bad news for the defendant. The complicated calendar of republican front runner facing three criminal trials and congressman jamie raskin on jack smiths decision to charge civil rights law used to prosecute kkk violence. Check out detroit. Check out when all in starts, right now. Good in a few new york. Im chris hayes. For the third time in four months, donald trump will be arrested and arraigned tomorrow. And a federal courthouse in washington, d. C. Hes got to be getting used to it by now. He will stand for a federal magistrate judge. He will enter a plea as he has done in the last two cases. In this new Criminal Case laid out against him for attempting to steal the 2020 election. Tomorrow he will be returning to the scene of that crime, as laid out in t
Third arrest and arraignment, the easy answer for the ex president s defense. The indictment specifically says that the president has the First Amendment right to speech. He even has a First Amendment right to lie. Its right here, this indictment is causing conduct not speech. And then, why the randomly assigned judge is bad news for the defendant. The complicated calendar of a republican front runner facing three criminal trials. And congressman jamie raskin on jack smiths decision to charge vil ghts law used to prosecute kkk violence. Check out detroit, check out philadelphia, check out atlanta. Good evening from new york, im chris hayes. But the third time in four months, donald trump will be arrested and arraigned tomorrow at the federal courthouse in washington d. C. Has got to be getting used to it by now. He will stand before a Magistrate Judge and enter a plea. As hes done in the last two cases. In the new Criminal Case laid out against him or attempting to steal the 2020 elect
You have to do some time. it wasn t as though she was sending them from extraordinary sentences, but definitely some period of incarceration she emphasizes is really nothing necessary. one case remember that stood out to me, she was saying that i think, quote, it was important that this individual went there not because of their love for country were supportive democracy, but because of quote, one man. not of course, mentioning how the man was specifically, but you can figure that one out who she speaking about. and she also, just in sort of a in terms of her career, judge cannon isn t overseeing a lot of criminal trials. in fact, had not had a chance of trial experiences a judge. managing as a judge is really challenging, technically speaking. it seems like judge chutkan has already managed a ton of this. it s something that she seems to have been doing for nearly a decade. she has. one of the most interesting things, and i ve seen her do this in numerous cases, compare
Supportive democracy, but because of quote, one man. not of course, mentioning how the man was specifically, but you can figure that one out who she speaking about. and she also, just in sort of a in terms of her career, judge cannon isn t overseeing a lot of criminal trials. in fact, had not had a chance of trial experiences a judge. managing as a judge is really challenging, technically speaking. it seems like judge chutkan has already managed a ton of this. it s something that she seems to have been doing for nearly a decade. she has. one of the most interesting things, and i ve seen her do this in numerous cases, compare and contrast the normal cases she handled regularly. people who have very few advantages in life, and how severe this advantages in life. just contrast it that with some