Streaming on cbsn bay area, looking live you can see the bay bridge on this friday. Thats your dose of pretty as we start the day. Good morning. It is october 23. I am len kiese. Here is your other dose of pretty. Oh you are so nice. Hes lying. Its the truth. Good morning. I am michelle griego. Lets get a check of our weather with meteorologist mary lee. Its friday. So glad its friday. Love you both. Love friday. We are looking the at a bit of a break from our fire danger thankfully so. I am watching relative humidity values rise with the on shore flow. We are looking at cooler temperatures with that Pacific Ocean breeze kicking in for us for today and for tomorrow and then looking at a stronger offshore wind event that arrives sunday. This afternoon, looking at highs around 64 in San Francisco, 70 oakland, 76 san jose, 79 concord. Five degrees cooler in San Francisco and a few degrees above average as we look to oakland, san jose, concord. Talking about those gusty offshore winds with
This wildfire season. Details on that are coming up in a few minutes. Gianna. Thanks. I am getting reports of fire activity and chp is also on scene. This is near North Livermore as you head out of the Altamont Pass. Its on the east bound side. They have livermore avenue ramp blocked from east 580, so you cant access that now. Fire crews are blocking the ramp. There were flames on the scene. As far as the impact to traffic, it is friday. Less cars are on the road way anyway. We have slight slowing building west bound 580 into altamont but things are fairly quiet out of tracy with no delays from 205. Improving Coronavirus Infection rates around the bay area are opening the door to new reopenings. Alameda is loosening restrictions as it moves to the orange tier. Kiet do is live in pleasanton with the businesses ready for this next phase. Kiet. Reporter good morning. Alameda county has spent the past two weeks preparing for this day. Yes, beginning today the following businesses can reope
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general