Late news, Fox News at night. Breaking tonight, the ceo of meta, Mark Zuckerberg with a huge admission saying his company was, in fact, pressured by the Biden Harris Administration to Censor Americans on facebook, something republicans say is clearly illegal. First amendment says that the government will not be involved in bridging your Freedom Of Speech and thats exactly what they did by pressuring zuckerberg to censor speech. Trace the confession comes after years of silence from the Social Media giant, Denial Or Defence from the Biden Harris Administration, but all the while political views were being shut down or tampered with and conservatives were being targeted. We have promoted responsible actions to protect public Health Safety and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our elections. Trace there is the denial appeared meantime major news from the Trump Campaign saying x. Democrats Tulsa Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy junior, who en
the camel s nose is under the tent. to the degree that president biden corroborated that by saying or referencing the fact that an exception was made for the most recent budget deal. so once these exceptions are made, you start to equivocate them. okay. if it was made for that, can t we make it for this? isn t that the slippery slope we re talking about? you re right. this is pandora s box. people say how about statehood for puerto rico or washington d.c.? how about status change for immigration? everybody would be banking on chuck schumer s door saying what about us. you can argument that was not a change for the debt creel ago few weeks ago because they had a procedural vote to break a filibuster. they went through that process. it s different. charles: chad, we have to let you go. we ll be right back with senator john cornyn. clients know wevestments, our have their backs. (other money manager) how do your clients know that?
investigation and that is the only way this president will be cleared. as he said he will be. why he would want to end the one mechanism to put the questions to rest, people ought to scratch their heads and ask why is that. the attorney general rod rosenstein has gotten criticism for referring the latest allegations to the inspector general at justice department and some believe that rod rosenstein caved to the president s demands. how do you see it? well he s in a very tough position. and i m going to refrain from criticizing him. the right answer for any justice department senior official when he is asked for political purposes to provide information in an ongoing investigation, the right answer is go pound sand. we re not doing it. and there was a brief moment when the deputy attorney general said we will not be extorted. well sadly, he was extorted. and so this never should have happened. and now that he s sort of opened the door a crack, the camel s
sense to anybody who opposes that? the argument i hear generally is a slippery slope. the camel s nose is under the tent. i don t accept that on this issue. i believe most members of congress should be able to distinguish between a common sense measure to help provide some measure of public safety versus, you know, a complete ban on firearms or confiscation. we can do that. when i was in the pennsylvania legislature in the early 90s, i remember, we when we passed background checks then, tom ridge was governor, we had the nra gun rights groups, gun control groups, law enforcement sit in the room and we agreed to the background check proposal on private sales of pistols. we couldn t do that today. but we did that back in the 90s. nobody complains about it in pennsylvania. we are a pretty gun state,
is listening to and who has the advantage and the initiative on this issue right now? i think he is listening to commanders and certain advisers both in state but also cia who are telling him that they are worried about the quick moves of isis and the alliances of isis with other parts of the sunni establishment and the worry they have that the weakness of the troops that we trained combined with the incompetence of malaki. we are seeing the ones we are trying to help incompetent and without resolve. i think he is worried that baghdad could fall and iraq could turn into a much larger mess or turn into a haven for terrorists again. he is hearing that and worried he doesn t want that to happen on his watch. trying to stop baghdad from falling is something 300 american troops is not going to make a difference in and training iraqi forces and you are talking about sending 300 elite troops when we left we had thousands there and we saw what happened with the iraqi military after we left