Maybe as university commencement, you get the idea. And then there are speeches from our most recent former president. Before i show you his speech today, i have to warn you it is vulgar. But we are going to play it uncensored, for reasons that i will outline after we play this sound. So prepare yourself. Im sorry, i wont be able to go to iowa today, i wont be able to go to the New Hampshire today, because im sitting in a court room today on bullshit because the Attorney General charge mean something. Terrible. [applause] bullshit bullshit that was a former president United States, president donald trump, in New Hampshire today, calling the multiple criminal indictments against him very serious charges, that was trump characterizing those indictments as bs. Im not bringing this up because trump was unhinged in New Hampshire today, but because how unhinged dont trumps may actually substantively matter for these court cases you might remember that last friday, after trump posted on his s
Seen time and time again. And, they will not leave it alone. They wont let it go. And it would be, perhaps more evident, if the congressional delegation from ohio wasnt so outrageously gerrymandered. Yes. Anyway, its a good day for people who like democracy, and Representative Democracy at that. Thank you my friend. And thank you for joining us from home, for this hour of television. Imagine, for one second, what a speech from a former president normally looks like. Maybe its the opening of a president ial library, maybe its a university commencement, you get the idea. And then, there are speeches from our most recent former president. Before i show you his speech today, i have to warn you, it is vulgar. But we are going to play it, uncensored for reasons that i wont will outline after i play you the sound. So, prepare yourself. Im sorry, i will be able to go to iowa today, i will be able to go to New Hampshire today, because im sitting in a courtroom on [bleep], because, his Attorney
to hit the area in over a century. the epicenter in the high atlas mountains near marrakesh is a yunesco world heritage site. equipment and manpower are limited in this region. patients are waiting outside hospitals, and residents are sleeping on the streets, fearing intense aftershocks. more than 700 people are in critical condition. officials believe the death toll will steadily rise. i want to bring in ben wedeman for more on all this. ben, you ve been to the area. set the scene for our viewers, what the topography is like, who lives there, why it s a tourist attraction and how an effarthque of this magnitude is cause so much damage. this earthquake happened just a few minutes after 11:00 p.m. friday evening. from the video we ve seen of cctv for instance, there was a small jolt followed by this massive earthquake. you see buildings just collapse in one cctv video. a block of buildings just falls into the street, sending tens of thousands of people sleeping outside last
Judge cannon, to have what s called a garcia hearing. and that means, that s old, law it goes back to 1975, where a defendant like walt nauta, is entitled to know, in an open hearing, or part of it could be theoretically, what the conflict is. and, what his lawyer may or may not be able to do, in cross-examine witnesses who are against him. that is not clear at all right now. it s really not a very attractive position for the lawyer to be in, because you cannot have a conflict between your clients. and, there s certainly appears to be a very serious conflict for stan woodward, with his prior clients and witnesses and waltz nauta. so, john and evan, just as we are speaking here, we are just receiving now, into cnn, the first mug shots from the folks who surrendered today. that is john eastman you are
One of the defendants lawyers, and his client. this is walt nada s lawyer, and he represents some of the folks, or is represented in the fact in the past folks who will be witnesses in this case. so the government asked the judge to set what s called a garcia hearing, so that they can go into open court and put that on the record, with the defendant present. some defendants will hear that their lawyer has a conflict of interest, and they might choose to reconsider that representation. you know, i don t want to be too suspicious here. i just find it to be possibly odd, that the judge has taken a motion that is supposed to be about one thing, and she has come up with this crazy theory, and instead she is trying to make it about that. so, i ll throw a little bit of oxygen onto the flames of the argument that andrew is making. we ll, please do joyce. because i think even to the layman, this seems deeply problematic. i mean, it s not just, it s more than. i mean, this is a judge who has