They didnt think it appropriate to go the police at that stage. Instead, the hospital asked the Royal College of paediatrics and child health to look at what had been going on in the unit. In november, the college called for the hospital to conduct a thorough external, independent review of each unexpected neonatal death. But the deaths werent investigated fully. Was this a cover up . I dont know how youd define a cover up but to us the. The evidence in front of us was quite clear it felt that they were trying to engineer some sort of narrative or way out of this that didnt involve going to the police. And if you want to call that a cover up then, thats a cover up. There were deaths and near deaths, which could not be explained, and were unexpected. And thatjust does not happen on a neonatal unit. But unfortunately, there was a concern about how it would look. So the reputation of the organisation and protecting that reputation was a big factor in how people responded to the concerns r
India News: This article discusses the different categories of diabetes mellitus, including type 1, type 2, and MODY. It explores the root causes of diabetes, suc
i had of this result and it made me feel sick, actually, thinking about it. there was a baby case in front of me in which it was quite clear that this baby had been poisoned by insulin. and the nursing record supported the fact that lucy letby was present, on shift at the time. the body produces insulin naturally. when it does, it also produces a substance called c peptide. most medical experts agree, if there s hardly any c peptide, then the insulin cannot be natural. if you measure very high levels of insulin with very low levels of c peptide, then it can only be the case that the insulin was not made by the body, so that would be objective evidence that there has been, that somehow insulin has been administered to this baby. it wasn t produced by the baby. and it can t have -
i had of this result and it made me feel sick, actually, thinking about it. there was a baby case in front of me in which it was quite clear that this baby had been poisoned by insulin. and the nursing record supported the fact that lucy letby was present, on shift at the time. the body produces insulin naturally. when it does, it also produces a substance called c peptide. most medical experts agree, if there s hardly any c peptide, then the insulin cannot be natural. if you measure very high levels of insulin with very low levels of c peptide, then it can only be the case that the insulin was not made by the body, so that would be objective evidence that there has been, that somehow insulin has been administered to this baby. it wasn t produced by the baby. and it can t have -
on shift at the time. the body produces insulin naturally. when it does, it also produces a substance called c peptide. most medical experts agree, if there s hardly any c peptide, then the insulin cannot be natural. if you measure very high levels of insulin with very low levels of c peptide, then it can only be the case that the insulin was not made by the body, so that would be objective evidence that there has been, that somehow insulin has been administered to this baby. it wasn t produced by the baby. and it can t have - happened accidentally? no, this would not happen accidentally. the review of patient records suggested a second baby had also been poisoned with insulin. the review of patient records suggested a second baby had also been poisoned with insulin.