thatis build up that social mixing. now, that is fine if you are intent on never having to do suppression measures again. but, from all of the evidence we have received from all of the advice that we have received, it was incredibly clear we were certainly going to have to do suppression measures again. we knew that all the way through. that was from the start. so, to then move forward and say, were going to get back into work when business wasn t even asking for people to come back into work, they were encouraging employees to stay at home, still. we developed all of these tools for remote working. but it was governments on its own demanding people go to work when the research we had were saying people were still quite cautious, businesses do not want to do it. the scientific opinion was that we would have to have another lockdown. to me it made absolutely no sense whatsoever why we were talking about getting everyone back to work and that were the stories that ended up bein
said, other than he didn t talk business. well, there hasn t been too many opportunities to ask him the questions about him because there haven t been white house press briefings, he has been traveling last week he was on vacation. he did get the question about it today. the white house has been arguing allies of the white house are essentially saying that they have not proven that president biden took money, took bribes that, when the speaker phone conversations took place that devon archer says that business wasn t discussed. it was more like how s the weather. that business wasn t discussed at these dinners and republicans haven t been age to show proof connecting president biden directly to hunter biden s business dealings. bret: yeah. it s just tough. the dinners, the phone calls, it s not all about the weather. number one. number two, the firing of that prosecutor in ukraine go back to that tape and it has a different
opinion, if biden if this is what he was saying, he was on the calls, but business wasn t discussed, still, why was he on the calls? to promote the brand is what archer is saying. is that just a pr issue if this is the way it s laid out or is there a legal issue? i don t see a legal issue from the facts we currently have. there s an irony here in a certain sense because congress is trying to justify the republican members this investigation on the idea we might need legislation. in order to try to regulate this behavior because right now you don t see any conduct that s legal, there is regulational law prohibiting it, even though it might be highly unethical or distasteful. right. thank you all very much. appreciate it. so many moving parts as we await these crucial grand jury meetings in the next few hours. next, trump s own words coming back to haunt him. uncovering video of the former president railing against hillary clinton for the same allegation he s facing now, trying t
importance of deficits. i have a tool for you if you care about debts and deficits. we can collect three per cent of gdp in taxes that are owed to the u.s. government today that come from high-end tax evaders that cost us 600 billion dollars annually. house republicans first order of business wasn t to make progress on that goal, it was to hurt us from being able to do that work. by making it easier to evade their obligations by defunding the irs. increasing the deficit. how is that consistent within focus on deficit as a guiding principle? as they play chicken with the debt limit, the one thing they achieved before was that they actually increased the cost of servicing the current that, because they increased in interest on our debt by running the risks that they ran.
-ing tonight. yeah, it is internally inconsistent, lawrence. on the one hand i m hearing all of this conversation that is coming from house republicans on the importance of debt, the importance of deficits. i have a tool for you if you care about debts and deficits. we can collect three per cent of gdp in taxes that are owed to the u.s. government today that come from high-end tax evaders that cost us 600 billion dollars annually. house republicans first order of business wasn t to make progress on that goal, it was to hurt us from being able to do that work. by making it easier to evade their obligations by defunding the irs. increasing the deficit. how is that consistent within focus on deficit as a guiding