united states, so they can do whatever they please. and if they all work together in 2020 support the same presidential candidate, which is very likely, and probably it will be a candidate that i support, by the way, they can shift upwards of 15 million 1 votes with no one knowing that they ve been manipulated, and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. tucker: so that s it, there is no election at that point. our democracy is not real if that is allowed to happen, correct? well, democracy becomes an illusion now. there are actions one can take. i set up, so far the only two big monitoring systems that anyone has built to actually look over people s shoulder as they are doing election-related online activities, and to aggregate that information and see what they are being shown by
but i will say this, just moments before we started here, i just got notified that susan majeski, the ceo of youtube, she actually followed me on twitter. i ve got over a million subscribers on there, and so much as an email address at youtube, but maybe i m starting to make some headway now. quickly, to your point on where sort of libertarians are at right now, i think there s an interesting moment here were generally small government people and i think you re sort of in that group, too our limits are being pushed on what small government actually means. for me, i would always prefer a private answer to this in competition, but maybe there has to be a sort of 2-pronged approach where politicians are putting pressure and public people are putting pressure, and we can maybe make these companies sort of be a little more transparent, be a little more open, which is really what anyone is asking for here. tucker: i would bring them to heal by force tomorrow.w. as aor libertarian solut
back in america, but, it might determine what happens in the next presidential election. a google whistle-blower has come forward to describe his company s plans to remake the american political landscape. google, of course, the most powerful company in the world, so when an anonymous whistle-blower comes forward, in this case telling project veritas that google is using internal algorithms to shape what americans see online, andta by essentially what they think, you better take itus seriously. it is a dog whistle. it does not mean what you think it means. you have to apply doublethink in order to understand what they are really saying. what they are really saying about fairness is they have to manipulate their search results so it gives them the political agenda that they want. and so, they have to re-bias their algorithms, so that they can get their agenda across. tucker: that s the definition of propaganda,
democratic party, as you know, coming out and labeling detention centers concentration camps, so we shouldn t be surprised when the speaker of her party and the leading democratic socialist candidate for president falls in line with aoc. and i tell you, the more they fall in line with aoc, tucker, the more out of touch they are with the american public. there is a recent gallup poll that shows for the first time immigration and illegal aliens where the highest mentioned when asked in an open-ended fashion, the american public, what s the biggest problem facing the united states? the only thing to beaded out? government, that was it. tucker: so this is tabsolutely destroying america, there is really kind of no question about it. just look at the trajectory. republicans are doing nothing about it. nothing. so why would any republican member of the united states senate, for example, who is into
dressing room to try on a piece of see-through lingerie because, explanation, she thinks she s going to persuade trump to put it on over his pants and greatcoat. this is preposterous. this is a woman who now says she wants to live in a world without men. her bookok is going around, askg women, why do we need men? she got the inspiration because the women writing into her advice column blamed all of their problems on men. imagine if a man blamed all of his problems on women. he would be viewed as a whiner and somebody not really in touch with his own situation. but feminism now is being used as a way to take out politicians we don t like, and to try to change the culture radically. tucker: so why would the press go along with that? why wouldn t someone over the course of the interview, especially if you gave w up afr