For at least one of his grandchildren. This investigation has been going on for years. It went all the way up to the Supreme Court in the d. A. s efforts to get the former president s Tax Returns both his personal returns and business returns. This is culminating today with charges against Allen Weisselberg and the Trump Organization. As you know the Information President Donald Trump is not expected to be charged nor any members of his family but this investigation remains ongoing and active. Source tells cnn. The Trump Organization will also have an attorney in court this afternoon. They are expected to enter a plea of not guilty to these charges. The big question here will be the breadth of the charges. What are they allege. How much money is involved because that goes to how severe the potential penalties can be, particularly for Allen Weisselberg. Now hes not cooperated at all as part of this investigation. The big question does that change as this goes forward. Well learn a lot m
ammunition the united states just sent there. now the state department has ordered non-emergency diplomatic employees from that same embassy to leave the country. in fact, any americans there are being warned to get out, quote, now. president biden is weighing some heavy options on how to handle this crisis. we have new nbc reporting on what it could mean for the movement of our troops. also, back here any second in minnesota, opening statements set to get under way in the federal trial of three former minneapolis officers charged with violating george floyd s civil rights. they were on the scene of his killing back in 2020. and a phrase no one wants to hear, it s officially tax season, folks. and if you were hoping it would be easier than past years perhaps because of the pandemic, think again. why things may be even slower this year than you re used to. and also some breaking news from the supreme court. in just the last 90 minutes, the high court has decided to take up a c
good day, i m chris jansing, along with my colleague, katy tur. what a day it has been with tremendous legal and political consequences, two hearings, both with huge consequences, in fact, for donald trump and the november election. one of them s pretty cut and try. the basic question was when can we get this thing started? in new york, the judge was straightforward, no more delays. the former president s hush money trial set to go forward a mere 40 days from now. chris, the other one, which is happening as we speak in fulton county is not so cut and dry, very much the opposite. it s getting messy, playing out you could say like a tv drama or even a soap opera. the hearing will start again any moment now, and it s already been pretty contentious, some would say borderline salacious. we are waiting for dramatic testimony to continue from special prosecutor nathan wade. he was forced to testify about his relationship with d.a. fani willis. before this break, wade was grille
file and why do you have the right to object on his behalf for attorney-client privilege well, i don t make formal guard. there we go and i believe that cheap he s already attempted to answer this question and there was no privilege raised. so he s given a partial answer and now he s about to finish that. so first of all, i don t think it s covered by attorney-client privilege and i ll deal with that if you want me to. but otherwise, he s already answered part of it he doesn t get to say now i m going to stop so what i was a long preface, but i don t think it ever actually got to what might have been at issue there. so if you can lay the foundation will deal with the objection take a step back you realize that an attorney-client privileges the privilege of the client, correct? yes, sir. and you connection with your representation, at least it s been profit to the court by mr. bradley that it s up to you to decide whether you want to raise the privilege, right? y
why he decided to file why do you have the right to object on his behalf for attorney/client privilege. i don t make formal there we go. and i believe he s already attempted to answer this question, and it was no privilege raised. so he s given a partial answer and now he s about to finish that, so first of all, i don t think it s covered by attorney/client privilege, i ll deal with that if you want me to, but otherwise he s already answered it. it was a long preface, i don t think it ever got to what might have been at issue there, so if you can lay the foundation, we ll deal with the objection. ok. take a step back. you realize an attorney/client privilege is the privilege of the client, correct? yes, sir. and you, in connection with your representation, at least as been proffered to the court by mr. bradley, that it s up to you to decide whether you want to raise the privilege, right? yes, sir. it s not up to mr. bradley. yes, sir. so you ha