the u.n., the state department, the pentagon is really pushing identity politics, race conscious politics in france. ideas about gender identity, gender fluidity and eastern europe and i think it makes ideological sense for the democrats to be all in on nato and the sort of transatlantic alliance and the people that try to take the people who are against trump within the administration on the first impeachment, the thing they were most upset about was that he would dare do what he ran on, pull back from nato and eastern europe. it s very strange though that the republicans of the same time or joining the democrats in voting for nato expansion, attacking biden just like they attacked obama for being too hawkish. they found the rhetoric of putting america first, the policy, the father beneficial. unfortunately, policywise it s the bush cheney party. tucker: they didn t mean it at all, thank you for pointing that out. he s not tough enough on russia? i mean, it s demented. these peopl
the way things are happening isi to say he s not tough enough on russia? while in 2016 trump ran on the idea of america first and rain on the idea of nothe being involved in foreign conflicts. who is very strongly against nato and he said it was obsolete. yet if people haven t noticed country nato has designed to counter hasn t existed for 30 years. the republicans founded beneficial to adopt this rhetoric. unfortunately on policy, and we seen this time and time again, it s basically the bush-cheney party. the extended nato and the last few years, we ve added north macedonia and montenegro, and these countries have militaries that are about the size of midsized u.s. cities police force and no one has intent to argue that this in any way defends america s interest. now it s become sort of a social
joe biden with everything they re doing at the white house is to say he s not tough enough on russia? well, in 2016, trump ran on the idea of america first and ran in the idea of not being involved in foreign conflicts. you know, he was very strongly against nato, he said it was obsolete. if people haven t noticed, the country nato was designed to counter hasn t existed for 30 years. so republicans found this beneficial to adopt a lot of this rhetoric. unfortunately on policy and we have seen this time and time again, it is still basically the bush cheney party. we ve expanded nato in the last few years. macedonia and montenegro, these countries have militaries that are about the size of a midsized u.s. city s police force and nobody even pretends to argue that this is anyway defends american interests. now you understand why democrats sort of like nato. it s become somewhat of a social engineering project.