this point, can we even blame m them for that because how many people within the west even respect themselves? how many off us really still know what we are about and what we stand for? nowadays the west the only thing that we stand for is like just transitioning our kids and posting ukrainian flags in our biosocial media. so i m wondering, you know w what what can we blame them for at this point? what this does? we totally for a lot of things about these people.uc well, this may be one of the things we could defend is the idea that violence is not acceptable in politicala discourse. i m against burning korans because i think it s rude, but that s veryyat i different from burning buildings. no, absolutely. i mean the message here is very clear. you burn a koran, we burn your cities and that is something that s obviously veryt different from how we handlee things here in the west and that s where i blamet- the liberal left wing elites who have allowed all of this to happen because the
Charles Krauthammer Debate Analysis
independentsentinel.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from independentsentinel.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
about this shooting, regardless of how much one disagree with something that pamela geller says or her group supports, in no way says they deserve to be shot at or targeted as they were last night. i couldn t agree more. i think that s absolutely undeniably true. i think i as an individual and southern poverty law center as an institution are defenders of the first amendment. it s possible to hold those two ideas in one set at the same time. the first amendment should be defended. free speech is a good thing. but pam geller and her organization is a hate group today just as they were the day before yesterday. i think that s important to remember. she does specialize in these kind of events. it seems to me it s similar to the reverend terry jones burning korans in florida. certainly that was protected
finally, finally got a giant national spotlight shining on the fact that he had no specifics to offer. that s why this debate was awesome. that s why this debate went fast. this was an exhilarating amount of ground to have covered in 90 minutes, an exhilarating amount of new information and new political truths that we did not know about before last night, but that we know now. it started right away. started right away. paul ryan saying, we should have apologized for u.s. marines urinating on taliban corpses in afghanistan but not say when asked directly and when pressed with a follow-up would not say if the u.s. was right to apologize for burning korans. no answer. no position on that. george w. bush administration apologized for that, the obama administration did, too. paul ryan is running with a guy who literally wrote a book called no apologies. does he also mean no apology for that?
finally, finally got a giant national spotlight shining on the fact that he had no specifics to offer. that s why this debate was awesome. that s why this debate went fast. this was an exhilarating amount of ground to have covered in 90 minutes, an exhilarating amount of new information and new political truths that we did not know about before last night, but that we know now. it started right away. started right away. paul ryan saying, we should have apologized for u.s. marines urinating on taliban corpses in aft afghanistan but not say when asked directly and when pressed with a follow-up would not say if the u.s. was right to apologize for burning korans. no answer. no position on that. george w. bush administration apologized for that, the obama administration did, too. paul ryan is running with a guy who literally wrote a book callcall ed no apologies. does he also mean no apology for that? no answer. whether a strike on iran would
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.