Bulk Spying News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Bulk spying. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Bulk Spying Today - Breaking & Trending Today
The bill go in to effect july 1st. brian: let s go down to down to steve and the judge. ainsley: in a fish bowl. steve: whether to renew a controversial surveillance program backed by the white house crucial measure in protecting all of us against terrorism. judge napolitano says it puts the constitutional privacy rights of every american at risk. explain that. judge: it s a very dangerous program. look, in the nixon era when president nixon used the fbi and the cia to spy on political opponents, the response to that was fight, is a foreign intelligence surveillance act which said no spying unless done through a warrant. except it permitted warrants from mass bulk spying, that is spying on huge numbers of people. steve: when they do every day. zip code, area code, a customer list. one of the warrants was for all customers of verizon. that s 115 million people. without any suspicion or allegations against any of ....
Obama is thinking and what advice they are giving him and what he s saying. everybody spies, anderson. it s a question of the degree to which they spy, how appropriate the targets are that they select and the invasiveness of that espionage. there is lots of costs and benefits to spying on allies, including the pact if they find out you re going to destroy the relationship of trust you build up between the allies. what the united states system of espionage is is a some unlike anybody else in the world does. mass bulk spying on the part of tens of millions of its citizens and tens of millions in the world. economic espionage, nothing to do with terrorism and spending a full decade listening to the person conversations of one of the closest allies. sure, other countries spy but nowhere near to the extent or invasiveness or cad hill list m of the government and that s why it s so controversial. glenn greenwald, thanks for ....
They re saying? everybody spies, anderson. it s a question of the degree to which they spy, how appropriate the targets are that they select and the invasiveness of that espionage. there is lots of costs and benefits to spying on allies, including the pact if they find out you re going to destroy the relationship of trust you build up between the allies. what the united states system of espionage is is a some unlike anybody else in the world does. mass bulk spying on the part of tens of millions of its citizens and tens of millions in the world. economic espionage, nothing to do with terrorism and spending a full decade listening to the personal conversations of one of its closest allies, sure, other countries spy, but nowhere near to the extent or what the invasiveness or cad callism of the united states government and that s why it s become so controversial. glenn greenwald, appreciate you being on. ....
Harm to the united states, have you seen any actual proof of harm to the united states? is there any proof that could be shown to you that could make you believe it harmed the united states? let a sing the government official who goes on television and says that anything that we published that s from the united states point to a single fact that we ve publish that resulted in any tangible harm and make them say what that harm is. the terrorists have always known forever that the united states government is trying to monitor their communications. we didn t tell the terrorist anything they didn t already know. what we told the world what they didn t know is this spying system is directed at innocent people, people that have nothing to do with terrorist and involved in economic trade, it s about bulk spying to increase the power of american officials and what dick cheney and those are worried about is not that we harm national security but we harm their reputations and their credibility ....
Harm to the united states, have you seen any actual proof of harm to the united states? have you seen any actual proof to the united states? is there any proof that could be shown to you that could make you believe it harmed the united states? let a single government official who goes on television and says that anything that we published that s from the united states point to a single fact that we ve publish that resulted in any tangible harm and make them say what that harm is. the terrorists have always known forever that the united states government is trying to monitor their communications. we didn t tell the terrorist anything they didn t already know. what we told the world what they didn t know is this spying system is directed at innocent people, people that have nothing to do with terrorists. people who are involved in economic trade. that it s all about bulk spying to increase the power of american political officials. and what dick cheney and barack obama and keith alexan ....