well, today the manhattan d.a. s office k trump what can really only be described as a brush off. in a newly unsealed legal filing, the a bragg s office wrote, the fact set forth in the indictment in the accompanying statement of facts provided the particulars to which the defendant is entitled. and then, they note that, the defendant is not entitled to the information requested. basically, mr. trump would only get what he isn t pedal to, and what he is entitled to right now is nothing. as the people advise the court in the defendant at his arraignment, the people are prepared to provide millions of pages of discovery to the defendant, once the defendant has been advised on the required of the terms of content of, and conduct prohibited by, the protective order entered by this so, prosecutors are saying, they have plenty of material to share with mr. trump s. millions of pages, in fact. but before trump can get any of it, he needs to understand the rules. and the rules here, they
she also has some very substantive, good legal reasons with precedent to back it up, to say, no, in this case, and once again, you get the brush off. do you think it is indicative of their own belief in the strength of their cases? is this a sign that they are like, you know what, we don t have to label on any of this. because we are about to get you. sorry to put it in layman s terms, but i m trying to interpret what the message might be. well, i think we actually have to take each case, alex, on its own terms. and i think it is easy to all the people we think as someone who is looking for delay as a tactic and you have got a decade of a track record of him trying to drag something out. but i think what he has done in each of these cases is different and you have to analyze the responses differently. so i think what fani willis has said is that the motion is both too late and too early. so, as danya said, it is too late. because some of the stuff you are complaining about, some of
committed in falsifying those business records. and that is because that second crime is what allowed the d. a. s office to charge trump with a felony and not just a misdemeanor. so that is information they very much want. well, today the manhattan d. a. s office k trump what can really only be described as a brush off. in a newly unsealed legal filing, the a bragg s office wrote, the fact set forth in the indictment in the accompanying statement of facts provided the particulars to which the defendant is entitled. and then, they note that, the defendant is not entitled to the information requested. basically, mr. trump would only get what he is entitled to, and what he is entitled to right now is nothing. as the people advise the court in the defendant at his arraignment, the people are prepared to provide millions of pages of discovery to the defendant, once the defendant has been advised on the required of the terms of content of, and conduct prohibited by, the
what allowed the d.a. s office to charge trump with a felony and not just a misdemeanor, so that is information they d very much want. well, today the manhattan s d.a. s gave trump what can only be described as a brush off. in a newly unsealed legal filing d.a. bragg s office wrote the facts set forth in the indictment and the accompanying statement of facts provide all the particulars to which the defendant is entitled. and then they note that defendant is not intitle today the information requested. simply mr. trump will only get what he s entitled to, and what he s entitled to right now is nothing. as the people advise the court and the defendant and his arraignment, the people are prepared to provide millions once the defendant has been advised on the record to content of and conduct prohibbed by the protective order entered on may 8th. so prosecutors are saying they have plenty of material to share with mr. trump, millions of
Heather Mitchell admits to 'self-silencing' when she felt threatened on set, but reveals her decades of work have been overwhelmingly joyous & collegiate.