Stay updated with breaking news from Brng on. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The audio alone and of course the nypd said they had nar more. what you are missing is the idea of the criminal, the actual men s raya and whether there was a consent that was given or rejected or not given the day before before the sting operation. it s incredible listening to that recording just sickening just the way he s trying to get this woman to do what he wants, everything from ordering her to basically begging her, bringing in his children, you know, swearing on his children. it s just to hear it is i mean, it s one thing to read it. it s another thing to actually hear it. yeah. it is incredible and it kind of, you know, it makes you think that this must have worked for him in the past, right. i mean, usually people don t do things unless they get the kind of results they want. so somehow this bullying and trying to wear done a woman who is clearly resisting is something that he s not only comfortable with but probably actually really enjoys. and, you know, i think as a ....
Comfortable and then they would leave and maybe the meeting was in a hotel room and it seemed legit at first and then all of a sudden everyone else leaves the room and it s just harvey weinstein and the person he apparently wants to assault. right. i mean, the thing is it s not just harvey weinstein that s the problem. and we focus on these people whether it s roger ailes or harvey weinstein who come along. there s a whole system around these people that supports what they re doing and that s something that has to be look at. and every person has to look at themselves as well and say how do i participate in the system. we talk about institutional racism. there s also institutional racism and misogyny and how am i participating this this because these people couldn t do what they re doing without the enabling of the people around them. and that s something that you see over and over. we talked about last night about how similar this was to fox news. i mean, all of the same factors are ....
Review, that basically said, why consider something that you know is too dangerous. so the issue is that the scientists determined that it was too risky. so we need to base our decisions on that science and quit wasting money from the taxpayers. and ultimately, ruining a fishery that so many jobs and so many family wages depend on. cnn did some analysis on secretary pruitt s meetings between april and september, they found that pruitt held 100 meetings with representatives of the fossil fuel industry during the time, only five with environmentalists or scientists. does that concern you? yes. absolutely. this is not what we expect the head of the environmental protection agency to do. we expect them to try to protect the environment. it is the resource of all people. it is not a special interest for sale sign that should be in the lobby of the epa. so what s next? ....
Today one big beneficiary talked to cnn about the scandal. what was your reaction when you heard the news about harvey weinstein? i was just sick. i was shocked. i was appalled. it was something that was justin tolerable in every way. and, you know, like so many people who have come forward and spoken out, there was a different side of a person who i and many others had known in the past. would you have called him a friend? yes, i probably would have and solid so many others. people in democratic politics for a couple of decades appreciated his help and support. and i think these stories coming to light now and people who never spoke out before, having the courage to speak out just ....
To plead to something. but it was not a god case to bring if you re a prosecutor. laura, could harvey wipe steen still face charges based on the allegations against him now by the number of women who have come forward? absolutely. and not just the women you re actually talking about from that 2015 incident. you ve got criminal and civil liable. on the civil side you may have charges against only harvey weinstein in terms of civil lawsuits but also the company. you also have the issue of criminal liability if some of the alleged conduct did occur within the statutory period of limitations. remember, most of this has to do with new york and california. neither of which any longer have a statute of limitation period that was as long as before. so if these are all recent allegations that could be brought within that statute, then absolutely you will have the ability to say he has a lot of liability and explaining to do. but i actually agree with mark on the issue of the 2015 case. what ....