A news and interview program, anchored by Erin Burnett. Have Breaking News about President Trumps former Campaign Chairman Paul Manafort. His righthand man rick gates face a grueling crossx admitting to an afarks a secret life, and lie after lie about money. And the question now is who will jurors believe, the acued liar Paul Manafort or the admitted Liar Rick Gates . Cara scan nell is outside the courthouse. How did it go for manafort . Well, manafort was really trying to put Rick Gates On Trial today. His Defense Lawyers were Hammering Gates about his lies about his admitted lies to the special counsels office, about false filings and Bank Accounts that gate had done in his own personal life, and really they were putting the focus on whether he embezzled from Paul Manafort. And there was a bit of a jockeying between gates and manaforts Defense Lawyer about where the money came from. Gates was not making many admissions. At various times he said he couldnt recall things whereas on dir
Rights, people should be allowed to do this. I would say that by Banning Jones and by shadow banning many others, facebook and others are now effectively becoming a publisher, and that means because they are taking editorial decisions come they should be open to being sued as other Media Organizations are. Tammy now i would argue, we are all trying to find some balance here because we clearly see its unfair and it ranges from congressman being shadow band, we are trying to find a free market, especially with the Mainstream Media being 85 liberal. We see that push. But we are the content and social media which gives us an edge. We would suggest though that some of the argument by twitter, they are saying that some of these comments violate standards. If we open it up to lawsuits for libel, wouldnt that make it even more difficult to have speech . Wouldnt more people be banned
and more people be suspended . No. If you are a platform for all ideas, you are not a part professional. On the
A look at breaking news, politics and reports from around the world. Ive made it clear theres no circumstances under which i would testify against the president. And you know, jim, just because hes not contacted by the Special Counsel doesnt mean that hes not in any kind of trouble. Usually the other case. That could indicate theres trouble for you. The other thing is that we have been led to believe that Special Counsel welcoming at some of stones personal finances. Hes had close ties to Paul Manafort, they were in business at one point together and could be another avenue that the Special Counsel could be pursuing. Certainly sounds like theyre pl laying the ground work. The date of muellers team to subpoena the wikileaks intermediary to appear is on september 7th. Whats that tell ugh about the timeline of the probe and whether hes close to finishing . Right. Thats randy credico. Also known roger stone for quite sometime. So that really tells us that this is going to way past the
date
A look at the days latest news and headlines. Manafort to try to get evidence on President Trump that could result in impeachment. This judge who later ruled the trial could proceed has been very critical of the Governments Team throughout and they are now filing motions complaining that he is prejudicing or misleading or confusing the jury with his quips. Theyve gotten him to admit he was wrong once in open court, but today he ignored their complaints. He constantly asked them how long the individual segments of the trial they are going to take he wants them to go as fast as possible. It was the judge today who delayed the start time by five hours. The jury was reminded very quickly how important it is they dont talk to anybody including each other about the details of this case. We have no idea why a 9 45 00 a. M. Starting time got pushed back to 2 30 p. M. And we arent going to find out immediately. The transcripts have now been
one point telling one of the prosecutors are you cryin
Exploring issues that affect leaders in the U. S. And around the globe. Win and sort of a good win is sometimes 10,000 votes. I want to put something up here. In 2006, 14 seats that democrats picked up were decided by 10,000 votes or less. In 2010, 16 seats that the republicans picked up were decided by 10,000 votes or less. So you only need a slice of those republican voters, suburban voters that they need to get chicken there when it comes to pelosi. Nancy pelosi is an easy target and its easy when youre campaigning as a nominee or candidate to say you would vote against nancy pelosi. When you get to d. C. And talk to nancy pelosi and talk to the people around the congress and realize that shes usually one of the only women in these highlevel meetings, you realize that as the Democratic Party talks about wanting diversity, she is part of that diversity. Of course shes in a tough place because there are so many democratic sources who say theyre eager for fresh blood. Youre looking at