of this complaint. thank you very much though our audience campaign. you ve all been a really important part of this. thank you to the two contenders. this is the last time you are scheduled to appear together. we are grateful to both of you for taking part. thank you very much. applause applause studio: and the two men shaking hands with mishal husain after an hour of clashes and claims. thanks to michelle of course as well. they ve had their say here in the spin room. the supporters will ve be vying to make their claim that their man was the winner. in the next half-hour, their man was the winner. in the next half-hour, politicians - their man was the winner. in the next half-hour, politicians and i next half hour, politicians and journalists will tell us was it dazzling or disaster? most importantly, remember, robertand taz need, two of the questioners, will be with us. we will find out if they thought the answers were good enough. we they thought the answers were goo
Frustrated with this approach and unless it really is just a question of someone in the cabinet office is deeply committed to this interpretation of collective responsibility it s a mystery why they re doing it. they re doing it. kerstin, on the ruestion they re doing it. kerstin, on the question of they re doing it. kerstin, on the question of what they re doing it. kerstin, on the question of what baroness - they re doing it. kerstin, on the l question of what baroness hallett can do on this, can she start the inquiry as planned and let this play out or does this delay the start of the inquiry? out or does this delay the start of the inquiry? she can. it s a matter for the inquiry the inquiry? she can. it s a matter for the inquiry whether the inquiry? she can. it s a matter for the inquiry whether they - the inquiry? she can. it s a matter for the inquiry whether they thinkl for the inquiry whether they think this is for the inquiry whether they think this is material for