Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. This is a confusion and an unelected judge trying to supersede and impose his values over the president. Thats what the census is for, to count the people in the country. Laura theyre counting all people. Count the immigrants. Laura hold on, scott. Theyre counting all people. Theres a question about whether youre a citizen or not. Now, what is the problem with answering the question . I dont understand that. What is the possible constitutional argument here . Well, because its racially offensive, first of all. Laura what does it have to do with race . Its directed at brown people and black people. Laura youre making that up. Of course it is. Laura its directed at all people in the country. You ask a question. I get asked the question. You get asked the question. We got another case. Does that mean ill right . Laura out of portland involvin
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Census. Up until 1950, we did have it on the census. The census changes and we didnt ask that question. Tell us about the posture of this case and this police judge, jesse furman. Laura what is happening here is that these judges are, you know, taking these cases and imposing their own judicial philosophy and new standards that are not written into the law into these cases. You saw the exact same reasoning that judge furman used here, which is that wilbur ross, in charge of the census in his department, had made some remarks about the reasoning behind wanting to count citizens that raised an issue of animus. Well the United States Supreme Court recently ruled that this Animus Theory is bogus and one of the elements that shouldnt be applied. Clarence thomas has spoken out on nationwide injunctions. So basically, this is a
confusion and we h
let s play this. bob lightheiser was on capitol hill. critics on both sides about the tariffs and how we re trying to take on china, this is brian schatt, democrat from hawaii. watch. first of all, you say the chinese are clever because they have a 50-year view. we should be clever and have a two or three-year view. that doesn t make sense to me. no. i m saying we re a democracy, so we take a shorter-term view because we re responsible to our voters periodically. so does that mean that democracies always lose to authoritarian governments? does it mean sir, it means you don t pick stupid fights. if your conclusion is that china taking over all of our technology and the future of our children is a stupid fight, you re right. we should capitulate. my view is that s how we got where we are. i don t think it s a stupid
bob lightheiser was on capitol hill. he was in front a of the senate committee. critics on both sides about the tariffs and how we re trying to take on china, this is brian schatt, democrat from hawaii. let s watch. first of all, you say the chinese are clever because they have a 50-year view. we should be clever and have a two or three-year view. that doesn t make sense to me. i believe that no. i m saying we re a democracy, so we take a shorter-term view because we re responsible to our voters periodically. so does that mean that democracies always lose to authoritarian governments? does that mean the state capital no. sir, it just means you don t pick stupid fights. if your conclusion is that china taking over all of our technology and the future of our children is a stupid fight, you re right. we should capitulate. my view is that s how we got where we are. i don t think it s a stupid fight. laura: that doesn t get