tonight on all in. i can go up and say to anybody, and thank you for the victories, wonderful. i can go up and say, who the hell was the impostor? an angry screed in victory. but the only person more angry than, say, me, but i don t get too angry, i get even. from a frontrunner self identifying as a bad apple. we call it the rogue cop. the bad apple. and perhaps you ll have that also with president. tonight, the case for more media coverage of donald trump. then. we are the last ones standing next to donald trump. the criminal justice case for nikki haley s enduring campaign. plus donald trump is a scab. as labor united behind joe biden, why aren t we hearing what a second trump term would mean for you? frankly i think they should pull the abortion pill off the market and demand - [applause] that the law is properly enforced. when all in starts, right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. we re through the iowa caucus and as of last
they have to be presumed you can t presume that this was just something that happens with a bureaucratic snafu, this is outrageous. well, the explanation for the quote, lost data sounds more suspicious this morning based on a new time line from lawmakers, julia insley is standing by with more on this story. plus, new subpoenas for supporters of former president trump. good news out of fulton county, georgia. nearly a dozen fake elects from one state could face criminal charges for election interference. things are heating up. meanwhile, trump hasn t given up on overturning the election he lost, apparently. a wisconsin lawmaker says the former president called him just this month, following a court ruling on ballot drop boxes. also, vladimir putin takes his first significant foreign trip since the invasion of ukraine as the russian president looks for an ally in a nation also isolated from the west. and the bidens meet with ukraine s first lady at the white house ole
class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy. we should at least do what we agree on, and that s to keep the middle class taxes low. eliot: the president also emphasized what he would not do a sending time to make a tax deal with house republicans. obama: what i m not going to do is to extend bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% that we can t afford and according to economists, will have the least positive impact on our economy. eliot: mr. obama also waded into the scandal that saw general david petraeus step down as director of the c.i.a. he offered assurances that damage from petraeus affair was at least so far confined to the general and his family, and offered some words of support. obama: i have no evidence at this point from what i ve seen that classified information was disclosed that in any way would have had a negative impact on our national security. i want to emphasize that from my perspective, at least he has provided this country an extraordinar
size doom if it a deal isn t cut by year s owned. but washington, both side have dug in their heels, and the answer may be that suddenly the sliding down the fiscal slope does not seem that bad. maybe that s why the republicans leaders like speaker of the house john boehner were able to put off making a counter proposal to the president s offer until today. crossing the red line on the talks by rejecting the demind that the republicans accept a hike in the marginal tax rate for those with income over a quarter million dollars a year. my view? obviously i agree with the white house on the substance and as i have said before, their hand gets stronger over time. but sometimes a new idea can change the dynamic. here is an idea that has been around for a long time, supported by james tobin way back and pushed by ralph nadar in a washington post op-ed this weekend. impose a tax on financial transactions. it will give us up to $100 billion a year, fail on a sector that has generat
far as your conversations with senior administration officials? sure. the original sources came from senator patrick leahy, the head of the committee that runs foreign aid. he said the white house told him clearly most military aid had been halted while the administration conducts its review of all u.s.-egypt aid. the white house said before and after my story came out that there s been no policy decision to issuspend the aid. they re playing a word game, have their cake and eat it, too. basically, they want to preserve the flexibility to turn the aid back on if that s what he ultimately decide do, but at the same time for now most of the aid is not flowing. that s a fact. but this is something that the white house is not ready to talk about. so it s something they re trying to parse on background. josh, they may not be ready to talk about it, but it s, of course, out there. right? either one of you can read it one of two ways. one, the administration is trying to keep as