Live Breaking News & Updates on Brett Kavanaugh Meet|Page 4
Stay updated with breaking news from Brett kavanaugh meet. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Get his nominee, but we have seen the president whether it is ronny jackson before, and other nominees be pulled, but they see it as much of a political fight as it is about judge kavanaugh getting the point of view out there. i want to also remind everyone that the accuser s name, and this accuser is julie swetnick, and he is not, judge kavanaugh n this prepared testimony addressing her in particular. it was really written in opposition to what dr. ford was alleging. wendy sherman is here, the ambassador and former undersecretary of state for political affair, and in context a member of the anita hill team when we watched that drama play out o, and of course, nbc national correspondent katet snow working to report this stor story, and then attorney fairstein from the new york prosecutor s office. ....
Whether michael avenatti is going to give the names to the committee or whether he is going to insist that the fbi is the one to interview them. lett me read two statements that some people might call ambiguous and ask you to drill down on these, and from this declaration. she says in paragraph 12, i have a firm recollection of seeing the boys lined up outside of the rooms at many of the parties waiting for their turn with a girl inside of the room. and these boys included mark judge and brett kavanaugh, and so she is not witnessing something, but witnessing them present in a lineup. and number 13 in approximately 1982, i became the victim of one of these the gang or the train rapes where mark judge and brett kavanaugh were present. she does not say itt is very carefully worded. she is saying present, but not explaining whether they were participants or not, and shortly thereafter, i have shared what transpired and she says that she ....
To her allegation, and so, originally, if you will remember, kavanaugh said before he knew what the e event was that ford was talking about, he said that i was not there, and i did not participate. that is impossible. so you need mark judge either side and both sides would want to call him. obviously, democrats to see if the ford allegation has legs, has another witness who observed it and certainly the republicans if they were trying to exonerate kavanaugh to hear judge say this never happened and i was never there, and i don t want to the talk about it. one other thing is another criticism of the way that the committee has structured the hearing which is by bringing in a prosecutor and having her question dr. ford whereas the democrats or the senators who are perhaps many of them are not lawyers and many of them are more discursive in the ....
Is my first point, and the second point is this, what is the rush to confirm brett kavanaugh? why the rush? this is not something that should be rushed, and this has to be a search for the truth. there has to be a full investigation of all of the allegations, and made within this declaration as well as dr. ford, ms. ramirez, and others. and mr. kavanaugh will have an opportunity to speak to the fbi, and he is going to have an opportunity to provide his version of events, but it is not something that you just rush through. you are talking about a lifetime ap a pointment lifetime appointment to the highest court of the land and it has to be done correctly and thoughtfully and done in a fair manner. now a statement from raj shah of the white house on behalf of judge kavanaugh, and the statement from judge kavanaugh is that this is ridiculous a ....
Was incapacitate and unable to fight off the boys raping me and i believe i was drugged with quaaludes or something similar. so that is at issue whether or not she is actually placing them at the house party or at the scene or participants. so if this were a criminal case, that is very, very important, because at least in the declaration, she is not alleging yet that mark judge or brett kavanaugh actually participate ed d in the gang ra but we are of course not in a criminal trial, and not in a criminal case. but this is about characterer and reputation. and about lying. i mean, brett kavanaugh has denied all of this both under oath and otherwise. if this is true, if he was what you call in legal circles merely present, that is still contrary to what he has said. and so for the someone nominate nod the supreme court of the united states, if there is proof that they are not being accurate, and if they are not being forth coming, that is very well disqualifying. ....