Filming. Also, if youre wondering what all the equipment is in the back of the room, its cspan, so make show your nicest smile, brush your hair, get ready, just in case you get a cameo. And when we get to the q a part, there is a microphone in the back of the room, and well let you know when its time for that, and well ask you to line up this to ask your questions. In a politically restive time, its always worthwhile revisiting the documents that set us apart from british rule and created the framework for our government. Tonight, our guest speaker, kermit roosevelt, explores these documents and shares his interpretation of their meaning and relevance. Professor roosevelt teaches constitutional law at the university of pennsylvania law school. He was born and raised in d. C. And attended Harvard University and yale law. Before joining the penn faculty, he served as a law clerk to Supreme Court Justice David souter. His book, the myth of judicial activism, making sense of Supreme Court
Good morning. This hearing will now come to order. I am pleased to welcome our distinguished panels of Witnesses Today on the economic subcommittee focusing on a very important topic and i think theres a lot of bipartisan interest in and that is the economic geostrategic challenge with the rise of china poses for the United States not just today but in the future. The calmness party led peoples republic of china through unfair treatment practices and intellectual property theft market manipulation and very prominently in my view not reciprocal treatment not just in the economic realm but in many realms has been a force in the Global Economy that undercuts the resiliency of the u. S. Economy. Its been one of the worlds fastestgrowing economies averaging close to 10 growth from 1979 to 2015. In 2014 china overtook the United States as the Worlds Largest country in reducing power according to the International Monetary fund. I believe there is a strong bipartisan interest and hopefully we
Good morning. This hearing will now come to order. I am pleased to welcome our distinguished panels of Witnesses Today on the economic subcommittee focusing on a very important topic and i think theres a lot of bipartisan interest in and that is the economic geostrategic challenge with the rise of china poses for the United States not just today but in the future. The calmness party led peoples republic of china through unfair treatment practices and intellectual property theft market manipulation and very prominently in my view not reciprocal treatment not just in the economic realm but in many realms has been a force in the Global Economy that undercuts the resiliency of the u. S. Economy. Its been one of the worlds fastestgrowing economies averaging close to 10 growth from 1979 to 2015. In 2014 china overtook the United States as the Worlds Largest country in reducing power according to the International Monetary fund. I believe there is a strong bipartisan interest and hopefully we
Said that the Trump Administration acted improperly by terminating the program in 2017. That is the last clearcut statement from the majority opinion. The courts reasoning, tortured throughout, and these five justices appear confused as they often do when roberts, the chief justice, is the swing vote. For example, this ruling does not touch the merits of the program, meaning daca remains in place but it could end at the hand rather the pin of this or any other administration. President trump reacting on twitter. He said, quote, these horrible and politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people who are proud to call themselves republicans or conservatives. We need more of justices or well lose our Second Amendment and everything else. Vote trump, 2020. Siding with the four liberal justices today was chief Justice John Robert as i said and this is the second time this week that he has sided in a ruling against the Trump Administrat
Said that the Trump Administration acted improperly by terminating the program in 2017. That is the last clearcut statement from the majority opinion. The courts reasoning tortured throughout. And these five justices appear confused as they often do, when roberts, the chief justice is the swing vote. For example, this ruling does not touch the merits of the program, meaning daca remains in place but it could end, end, the pin of this or any other administration. President trump reacting on twitter, he said, quote, these horrible and politicallycharged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people who are proud to call themselves republicans or conservatives. We need more justices or well lose our Second Amendment and everything else. Vote trump 2020. Siding with the four liberal justices today was chief Justice John Roberts as i said. And this is the second time this week that he has sided in a ruling against the Trump Administration. In the major