status as a non profit. any used by eastman of the emails was improper and unauthorized. it was like into contraband, as you just said. so you ve got the actual possessor s of the document saying, these are contraband. and now the claim that he is trying to make that these were protected by attorney client privilege, is that right? exactly. chapman s lawyer has argued that, we ll, chapman you i m sorry, eastman s lawyer argued that chapman knew that he represented outside clients. obviously, chapman is disputing that and is disputing that you have the right to do it. but it s a bottom line reminder for everybody that if you are doing personal work, don t do it on your employers computer server, because they own the material, not you. that s a news you can you
that and is disputing that you have the right to do it. but it s a bottom line reminder for everybody that if you are doing personal work, don t do it on your employers computer server, because they own the material, not you. that s a news you can you use segment you can get here. just go sign up for gmail or proton account, very easy to do. when we think is in the documents? i was shocked by the number i have to say, and following your reporting, my sense of his sensuality ascended in so far as, it seemed like he might have been a little bit of an arms distanced guy who got this in front of them, but it seems like it was fairly central during the entire plotting. he was, john eastman who was a law professor, former clerk to supreme court justice clarence thomas, esteemed in conservative legal circles, he was certainly respectable. he was in many ways one of the
ambassador of the unitees nations, turned senator from new york, daniel patrick moynihan, in more than a few debate with his own bottom line reminder. you re entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts. and those words are worth using and focusing on as we head into next week s general assembly meeting in new york of the unites nations. we really don t have time today to pretend that anyone can have their own set of facts, approaching the issue of chemical weapons in syria. this fight about syria s chemical weapons is not a game. it s real. it s important. it s important to the lives of people in syria, it s important to the region, important to the world, that this be enforced, this agreement we came out of geneva with. for many weeks we heard from
ambassador to the united nations turn senator from new york, daniel patrick moynihan end more than a few debates with his own bottom line reminder. you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts. and those words are really worth using and focusing on as we head into next week s general assembly meeting in new york with the united nations. we really don t have time today to pretend that anyone can have their own set of facts. approaching the issue of chemical weapons in syria. this fight about syria s chemical weapons is not a game. it s real. it s important. it s important to the lives of people in syria. it s important to the region. it s important to the world. that this be enforced, this a agreement we came out of geneva with, and for many weeks we