Clicking online on something that said barack obama or you gave people the option of clicking online on something that said mitt romney, more people would click on the thing that said barack obama. Consistently. By a lot. In a controversial article last summer right in the heat of the campaign, an article that acknowledged what everybody else in the media already knew was true, but had not admitted out loud, the website buzz of feed finally put a headline on it and put it up in black and white. Mitt romney is terrible for traffic. They mean web traffic. They did what essentially amounted to a control experiment in terms of peoples interest online in the two candidates. Look. 29 photos of baby barack obama versus 30 photos of mitt romney as a child. Essentially, youre offering the same thing. Reliably adorable childhood images of people you know now as full grown men. Its the same comparison, apples to apples. The photos of baby obama got just under 70,000 views. The photos of baby romn
The protection of children first. Thats and where does that start . What should they do . Well, at a bare minimum they should start by putting out the names of the credibly accused predators that are in the midst of the church today, which is, what, about 30 bishops here in the u. S. Have already done. They should immediately make it very clear that anyone any bishop or topranking Church Employee who is found enabling or concealing sex crimes will be fired. And then they should follow up on these kinds of rules and actually fire those who have engaged in it. I mean, they should definitely, for example, remove Bishop Bishop flynn from kansas city, whos been convicted of abusing sorry. Hes been convicted of endangering children. Okay. And he still holds his place. Well, this is certainly an opportunity for the Catholic Church to move on the issues that were talking about. No question. Barbara blaine, thanks for your time tonight. I appreciate it. Thats the ed show. Im ed schultz. A progr
In a measurable sense. If during this election cycle you gave people the option of clicking online on something that said barack obama or you gave people the option of clicking online on something that said mitt romney, more people would click on the thing that said barack obama. Consistently. By a lot. In a controversial article last summer right in the heat of the campaign, an article that acknowledged what everybody else in the media already knew was true, but had not admitted out loud, the website buzz of feed finally put a headline on it and put it up in black and white. Mitt romney is terrible for traffic. They mean web traffic. They did what essentially amounted to a control experiment in terms of peoples interest online in the two candidates. Look. 29 photos of baby barack obama versus 30 photos of mitt romney as a child. Essentially, youre offering the same thing. Reliably adorable childhood images of people you know now as full grown men. Its the same comparison, apples to ap
This is where they belong. [ music ] bill good morning, friends and neighbors. A happy wednesday morning to you. Its wednesday february 27th. This is the full court press coming to you live from our studio in capitol hill and booming out to you live to current tv. Thanks for joining us this morning. I am sure you want to know all of the big stories of the day. Thats what we will bring you. I am sure you want to talk about them. Thats the opportunity we give you by giving us a call a lot 86655press. And yes, just three days now away from the sequester kicking in. The federal government has startedsponding by releasing Illegal Immigrants from prison. Isnt it time maybe for john boehner to get off of his ass and do something to prevent the sequester from kicking in . On other news chuck hagel has been confirmed as the next secretary of state. Pat roberts warns there could be demons from the clothes you buy from Thrift Stores. Watch out. All right. All of thats come up and a whole lot more
In a measurable sense. If during this election cycle you gave people the option of clicking online on something that said barack obama or you gave people the option of clicking online on something that said mitt romney, more people would click on the thing that said barack obama. Consistently. By a lot. In a controversial article last summer right in the heat of the campaign, an article that acknowledged what everybody else in the media already knew was true, but had not admitted outloud, the website buzz of feed finally put a headline on it and put it up in black and white. Mitt romney is terrible for traffic. They mean web traffic. They did what essentially amounted to a control experiment in terms of peoples interest online in the two candidates. Look. 29 photos of baby barack obama versus 30 photos of mitt romney as a child. Essentially, youre offering the same thing. Reliably adorable childhood images of people you know now as full grown men. Its the same comparison, apples to app