Live Breaking News & Updates on Blanket Assertion|Page 5
Stay updated with breaking news from Blanket assertion. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Th not by this committee. and sixth, on friday we learn that president trump is claiming executive privilege over an additional 102,000 pages of your records. such a blanket assertion is simply unheard of in the history of this country and the reason it s unheard of is because it is so outrageous. the last time a president attempted to hide a supreme court nominee s record by invoking executive privilege was when president reagan did this for justice william rehnquist. then republicans and democrats came together. we demanded the documents be releas released. and president reagan said okay and they were released. boy, how times have changed. and so to date we ve received less than half of senator ....
Answer about what jared kushner did or this answer here in the run- run-up, at that point does this then does it make it that much harder for the president s team to fight this subpoena? it makes it harder, but in these situations, in these executive privilege claims and counterclaims, there are no blanket assertions. the president can t make a blanket assertion, and mueller can t say can t make a blanket assertion and say we demand we need all of this just because we re running a criminal investigation. so he needs to say in each instance, this is why i need to find out about the trump tower meeting. and he s in a much stronger position there, you know, before the election. on the obstruction part, does he really need the president? i mean he s putting together a it looks like they re widening it out with the tweets, connecting actions, they have testimony of potentially reince priebus and don mcgahn of saying when they briefed him, for instance, on when did the president ....
Much too vocally, taking a position on things that he can t possibly have clear knowledge of at this stage of the representation. any lawyer cosming into a case like this would keep his head down for a period of time and make sure he had the facts in line. and this attorney is not doing that. so i d have to say no, he is not helping his client at all. and laura, as for the russia investigation, a big question in all of this is will the president take the fifth amendment? here is rudy giuliani on that. are you confident the president will not take the fifth in this case? how can i ever be confident of that? when i m facing a situation with the president and all the other lawyers are, in which every lawyer in america thinks he would be a fool to testify. so laura, what do you think? will the president ultimately take the fifth? it always be his choice to do so. but remember, taking the fifth, everyone has an assumption that it means he can walk in there and i m taking the fifth ....
The abuse took place during a sexual encounter. schneiderman apparently slapped someone during an argument. it s very odd that he would parse it out this t way he did, that he had never engaged in nonconsensual sex. that s the line he would not cross. but apparently assault is not one in which he would vehemently deny the allegation. he would simply say he vehemently contests the allegations. maybe he has his eyes towards a defamation case or perhaps other things about calling somebody a liar or their actual statements to be untruthful. but what says to me is he has legal counsel, and he himself, by the way, the top dog lawyer in new york should know enough not to make a blanket assertion or statement that could be used against him later. so he parsed it out in a very careful way. but legally speaking that you didn t commit nonconsensual sex, which is known as rape in other people s world is not enough to say that you did not commit the other crimes that you were accused of, includin ....
Much too vocally taking a position on things he can t possibly have clear knowledge of at this stage of the representation. anywhere coming into a case like this would keep his head down for a period of time and make sure he had the facts in line. this attorney is not doing that. i d have to say, no, he s not helping his client at all. laura, as far as the russia investigation, a big question in all of this is will the president take the fifth amendment? here s giuliani on that. are you confident the president will not take the fifth in this case? how can i be confident of that? when i m facing a situation with the president, all the other lawyers are, which every lawyer in america thinks he d be a fool to testify. so, laura, what do you think? will the president ultimately take the fifth? well, it s certainly always going to be his choice to do so. remember, taking the fifth virn everyone has this assumption it means he can walk in and simply say, i m taking the fifth and no ....