Stay updated with breaking news from Bit judge. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
This is something the president predicted was right was never a legal basis for this, correct . President trump won the legal argument today. And the Supreme Court came out on his side and lifted the stay that the Appeals Court put in place. But the legal argument was never the strongest argument against the ban. Its the policy argument. Really bad policy. Tucker will you concede that there was a legal argument against it, that the left as a group made and it was that a single judge in hawaii had more power over americas Foreign Policy and control of americas borders than the president did and the Supreme Court today said thats absurd. It wasnt just hawaii, tucker. There were a number of court cases in a number of courts that stayed this travel order. And it was a clos ....
Thats why we have a president. You will concede that. I think thats a valid argument and thats the argument that was made. Thats one of the arguments that persuaded the Supreme Court today. Although, keep in mind, that the court only lifted the stay. It will hear the merits of the case in october. But, yes, you are right. But, as i said, the stronger argument against this travel ban is its really bad policy. It doesnt accomplish the goal which is notomake america safer. Tucker it doesnt. You would argue the counter case that the more immigrants that we have from say somali coming into the country the safer we are . What point are you making. What i would argue on Policy Grounds this ban is both too broad and not broad enough. Let me explain. Heres why its too broad. It denies muslims from six predominantly muslim countries. Tucker let me stop and correct you. It makes no refer ....
That they trust. they know that the republicans are telling the truth. sto and i m not going to stop until 100% of americans know wit the truth and know what happened with the biden family and the amount bidel of corruption. this will be one of the most corrupt presidencies in united states history. when we re done with them, we shouldn t stop until every american knowsrican what happened. all right. so the the oversight committeekt that you re on is the tip ofs th the spear. what s nexe tip oft? well, we also have think it s it s time this t fall when we get back in session to start subpoenaing people we should knostart suw es single witness. we should know every single bank record and bank accountine the americans, they don t trust congress. but i want them to trust the evidence congress t that comes forward. every bit of evidence that w evo find on every one of these committees ought to be released to the american people. let them t judge for themselves how bad it truly is. you ....
Of the gun diversion document that they didn tn t gave give t judge until the hearing began, hopinghe that she wouldn t bother to read it. well, she smarter that and she i did read it and it wast. a huget read flags bells went off. and that s when she began ask these penetrating questions of peneprosecutor who was getting and the guy just caved in. you know, like a beach chair. and that s when hunter biden slr ,you know, lawyers stood upripp and said, we re ripping uping the deal. the now what i worry about is over the course of the next 30 days, they ll say, i will take out that immunity thing in the document. but we assure you privatel.y and secretly that we re going to close the books on hunteroksh biden, which means closing the books on your dad. nothin g further. close how do they get to close the books on it? bog is right here, stephen. how do they close the books on this? hoosknowing what we are learninr ....
Agreement thatt that might not stick to him. yeah. so that t stick s i mean, that s the the question is we re going ha have to wait until the plea happens in julppy to see who is the presiding judge. if it is thas t judge and it s a trump appointed judge, i mean, certainly she will look at the entirety of the facts. y thd i think to your point,ou one of the things that that judge is going to consider is other similarly situatee judd defendants, because in the federal system, everyone should be treated similar. no matter who their father happens to be or what their political connections. baseso, you know, i think based on my experience in doing many of these cases as a u.s. attorney, i know that similar cases have been punished a lot e more than what the current deal is for hunter biden. and matthew, you haveor huntg history in law. i mean, it wasn t just acting ag for. trump.torney you were a u.s. attorney in the bush administration. have iistratio you ever in youre there seen a ca ....