they? forso companies have a dilemma, don t they? for so long, companies have a dilemma, don t they? forso long, governments haven t met their spending commitments. did they invest now in the next generations of weapons when they don t know how long the war might last? might last? exactly. first, thanks for havin: might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me- might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me. i might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me. i think might last? exactly. first, thanks for having me. i think they re - for having me. i think they re looking at stuff like many european companies. the concern is that all attention is on ukraine and nato members are talking about reaching the spending target that lots of countries have field to do. the big question is what will happen five or ten years down the line. the general who heads us forces to put together a report. in terms of where its focus will be, how in arms itself, what would you expect to
just match but outdo that embrace of the future. my approach to the way we were much we find space to develop and grow in the nation is in tennyson s words, to strive, to seek, to find and it is in that spirit that i want us all this christmas to fall back in love with the future. thank you. that christmas to fall back in love with the future. thank you. christmas to fall back in love with the future. thank you. that was the healthy and the future. thank you. that was the healthy and levelling the future. thank you. that was the healthy and levelling up the future. thank you. that was the healthy and levelling up secretary i healthy and levelling up secretary michael gove housing. i think he will be taking questions, his plans for planning and housing across england. let sjust check for planning and housing across england. let s just check to see if he is taking questions from the floor. bi; he is taking questions from the floor. , he is taking questions from the
While neuroscience has been used in Australian courts for the past 40 years, no systematic empirical study has been conducted into how neuroscientific evidence is used in courts. This study provides a systematic review on how neuroscientific evidence is considered in sentencing decisions of New South Wales criminal courts. A comprehensive and systematic search was conducted on three databases. From this search, 331 relevant sentencing decisions before 2016 that discussed neuroscientific evidence were examined. The findings of this study suggest that neuroscientific evidence appeared to contribute to sentencing decisions in less than half of the cases examined; and in the majority of these, it supported a more lenient sentence.
talking about. but clearly, brexit s a factor talking about. but clearly, brexit s a factor in talking about. but clearly, brexit s a factor in that. i also think britain a factor in that. i also think britain in a factor in that. i also think britain in general has suffered from a chronic britain in general has suffered from a chronic advertisement and savings, which a chronic advertisement and savings, which is a chronic advertisement and savings, which is discouraged investment from abroad which is discouraged investment from abroad i which is discouraged investment from abroad. i think there s a deep structural abroad. i think there s a deep structural problem here, and certainly structural problem here, and certainly there needs to be more as incentive certainly there needs to be more as incentive to certainly there needs to be more as incentive to come and float on the london incentive to come and float on the london stock exchange and that s big projects