Live Breaking News & Updates on Bina Puri Holdings Berhad

Stay updated with breaking news from Bina puri holdings berhad. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Apex court considers application of Prest in piercing corporate veil


Introduction
A separate legal entity – or rather, a corporate veil – exists to separate a corporate entity from its incorporators upon incorporation. Citing the century-old case
Solomon v A Solomon & Co Ltd,(1) Justice Nallini Pathmanathan stated the following in
Ong Leong Chiou v Keller (M) Sdn Bhd:(2)
The juristic principle comprising the bedrock of company law is the legal fiction that on incorporation, the corporate entity is clothed with a separate and distinct personality. It is a legal person distinct from its members.(3)
It is also well established that the corporate veil can be lifted or pierced when the corporation is used for fraudulent, dishonest and unlawful purposes. ....

United Kingdom , Sdn Bhd , Bina Sdn Bhd , Leong Chiou , Justice Pathmanathan , Justice Nallini Pathmanathan , Kellerm Sdn Bhd , Sime Darby , A Solomon Co Ltd , Bina Puri Holdings Berhad , United Kingdom Supreme Court , Gan Partnership , Ong Leong Chiou , Lord Sumption , Hong Leong , Federal Court , Sime Darby Capitalmalls Asia , Melawati Mall , Perfect Selection Sdn Bhd , Perfect Selection , Bina Puri , Perfect Solution , Gan Khong Aik , Kang Mei Yeeat Gan Partnership , Civil Appeal , Aw Firms ,

Continuing rise of statutory adjudication


Introduction
The year 2019 witnessed a myriad of statutory adjudication disputes in Malaysia. The surge in the number of disputes involving the statutory adjudication mechanism in the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act (CIPAA) 2012 also led to a significant number of consequential challenges to adjudication decisions in the courts. This article highlights the notable decisions handed down by the Malaysian courts in 2019 and their effect on the future application of the CIPAA.
Prospective effect of CIPAA
The following noteworthy appeals marked the beginning of a dramatic departure from the retrospective effect of the CIPAA observed since its enactment in April 2014:
Jack-In Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (M) Sdn Bhd ([2020] 1 MLJ 174); and ....

Commonwealth Of Australia , Gemilang Sdn Bhd , Sdn Bhdv Tasoon , Sdn Bhdv Bina , Selva Kumar , Pasukhas Sdn Bhd , Murugiahv Thiagarajah , Sdn Bhd , V Sycal Bhd , Fortuna Holdings Pty Ltd , Asian International Arbitration Centre , Holdings Bhdv Bisraya Construction Sdn Bhd , Corp Sdn Bhd , Telecommunications Sdn Bhd , Zantingh Ltdv Zedal Building Services Ltd , Electronics Sdn Bhd , Construction Industry Payment , Adjudication Act , Construction Sdn Bhd , Bisraya Construction Sdn Bhd , Federal Court , Jack In Pile , Pembinaan Perisai Hebat Sdn Bhd , Panzana Enterprise Sdn Bhd , Fabrication Sdn Bhd , Gemula Sdn Bhd ,