gamesmanship. the whole thing is silly. create jobs and get the economy going. make stupid congress look even stupider. speaker boehner. he could have said, all right, i ll take the high road. now he has pushed the president around again. who, if anyone, wins this political game of hard ball? the republican snub may be historic, but republican obsti-nance is not. of those seeking work have found it. it s deja vu all over again. imagine congress telling lbj, no, you re not going to give a speech here. let me warn you same thing with reagan, same with fdr. cross our hearts and hope to die, we believe in work for the unemployed. but the ideas of the republican candidates are historic. every idea being advanced by every republican candidate career politicians has been tried before and failed. and i have a record, and i ve got a record i m proud of. mitt romney or governor perry or congresswoman bachmann. both ronald reagan and
be a personally negative campaign or a negative campaign built on issues. you cannot talk to a democrat in this town or even in chicago working on the campaign without them volunteering information about what allows the candidate they think mitt romney will be, the candidate that rick perry will be, how that comparison they ll be able to make, supporting unpopular things like the ryan budget, will help them. they also point to polling for the republican party. generally republicans in congress is very low right now. i m not sure i m not sure a lot of independent observers are totally convince the it s going to be that easy. polling for the republican party was extremely low. polling for republican leadership in congress was extremely low at the end of 2010 when republicans took the house. the american public right now is in the habit of turning the bums out of office, whoever they are, because they have been angry now for three cycles. and there s a real risk that could happen again
for incomes of $10 million or more. that means you, bill o reilly. the last line of buffett s op-ed reads, my friends and i have been coddled long enough by a billionaire friendly congress. it s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice. these days, the oracle of omaha is only ignorable in the house of representatives. in europe, some of the super rich are joining warren buffett s call to action. this week, maurice levy wrote a companion piece to the buffett op-ed in the financial times. he is the chairman and chief executive of thd0giant french advertising company. the headline for his op-ed is, i am not a masochist, but the rich must pay more. the french, you see, must always make some kind of sexual confession to get your attention, even when discussing tax policy. so, ok, he s not a masochist.
you cannot talk to a democrat in this town or even in chicago working on the campaign without them volunteering information about what allows the candidate they think mitt romney will be, the candidate that rick perry will be, how that comparison they ll be able to make, supporting unpopular things like the ryan budget, will help them. they also point to polling for the republican party. generally republicans in congress is very low right now. i m not sure i m not sure a lot of independent observers are totally convinced it s going to be that easy. polling for the republican party was extremely low. polling for republican leadership in congress was extremely low at the end of 2010 when republicans took the house. the american public right now is in the habit of turning the bums out of office, whoever they are, because they have been angry now for three cycles. and there s a real risk that could happen again next year. michael, your last paragraph is the perfect antidote to anyone w
that means you, bill o reilly. the last line of buffett s op-ed reads, my friends and i have been coddled long enough by a billionaire friendly congress. it s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice. these days, the oracle of omaha is only ignorable in the house of representatives. in europe, some of the super rich are joining warren buffett s call to action. this week, maurice levy wrote a companion piece to the buffett op-ed in the financial times. he is the chairman and chief executive of the giant french advertising company. the headline for his op-ed is, i am not a masochist, but the rich must pay more. the french, you see, must always make some kind of sexual confession to get your attention, even when discussing tax policy. so, ok, he s not a masochist.