u.s. election, that is an egregious civil liberties violation. it is impeachable conduct right then and there, full stop. then we go on to the aggregating factors of whether or not the president in the course of doing this actually threatened or suggested that he might withhold congressionally authorized funds to that foreign nation in order to effectively extort them into performing this civil liberties violation in order to benefit him politically for the purpose of influencing an election. the it s hard to fully capture the scope of how big a violation, how big a breach this would be. there s a little bit of a risk here of getting overly focused on sort of the specific criminal elements. was there a quid pro quo? did he make a promise. of course, we can infer quid pro quo from the context and circumstances, but honestly, that s almost besides the point. what we re seeing reported already is really beyond the pale. where s the legal line, jeffrey toobin, here? i don t know.
recently at the home where michael jackson s children live. one of their cousins reportedly ordered a stun gun and had it delivered to their house. apparently jafar tested it on a piece of paper. katherine jackson, the grandmother, heard the noise and confiscated the we re. an attorney says the jackson kids were never exposed to the stun gun. an investigation is under way at new york s jfk international airport after an air traffic controller and a supervisor allowed a child to give orders to pilots preparing for takeoff. this is what the pilots heard. jetblue 171 contact departure. over to departure jetblue 171. awesome job. 03 clear for takeoff. let s bring in tom costello. how big a violation is this? reporter: it s a pretty big violation. children are not supposed to be giving clearances for commercial aircraft and, listen, this is