Since the modern inception of the idea of Jewish statehood and the birth of Zionism, the Serbs have always proposed the notion that the Jewish people should be their own masters with their own land.
take it. the house bill is unacceptable. have a senate bill that confused everyone even more and a president who made no case for the bill. ma whanlgor legislation gets passed, reagan s tax cuts, obamacare, without the president explaining the bill and making the case to at least his own supporters come on board which as susan says they haven t. i would start over and maybe this is a useful moment for mcconnell and ryan, we re going to try bipartisan shap. democrats don t do it, fine, they ll get credit for having tried. the president has a big mega phone but first he has to understand what s in it. he didn t understand this was a tax bill and the tax cut he s talking about down the road depended on the monies saved from health care. without that, the rest of his agenda is really in jeopardy. one of the questions i find fascinating is the market has clearly reacted to the prospect of ultimately the corporate tax going down, which is dependent on the health care bill passing, so at
their beliefs. the second is what you would call the big shot bubble which was a big piece and slate talked about this. powerful people with big mega phones who don t have anyone disagreeing with their crazy ideas and falsehoods. mr. walsh is a respected man. that s uncontested. but he is spewing a kind of falsehood and dance that s, as chuck said, incredibly corrosive. who are we supposed to rely on to figure out the baseline discussion of economics and business if not the business leaders separate from politics and ideology. the problem is the referees and this is a point i m sure some disagree with, but the referees have to figure out how to call it without worrying if it looks partisan. you have to get in there and say it s not just terrible.
explicitly d lly given a role i shaping policy. that seems to be a step beyond? we ve been. you went to the campaign and what do they say? restore our future, independent. we don t comment on contributions to that. now, look, we ve seen the blurring of the lines so far on this, and, you know, when priorities usa, when the obama campaign wanted to signal big donors, should give priorities usa, it s the campaign that makes the announcement. if that wasn t a sign of the blurring between the superpac and the campaign, what is? this one is another example of that. a guy who s got an explicit role in the campaign and is a big mega donor. also a fund-raiser for romney in oklahoma city in may. so one more sort of how do you distinguish? between the campaign and the superpac? the law claims there s a difference. a distinction without a difference. right. open secrets. a little analysis of theonors.