Stay updated with breaking news from Being subverted. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
because it is being challenged and we have to accept that and respond to this challenge, which i hope we will be doing in this debate. despite the hysterical reactions of the country can i think it s important to state that this is a properly constituted senior committee of the house as indeed the leader of the house did so in her remarks. it was asked to do a difficult but vitaljob and it discharged its duties with integrity and honour will stop it is our duty now, i believe, before this house to ensure that we support the members of that committee and we support the conclusions that they have come to after this detailed work. i believe also we should thank the members of the privileges committee because they have done the house of commons a very great service under the most intense pressure. instead of being thanked, they have found themselves traduced in the borisjohnson worshiping print and tv media, which has called into question their motives and their very integr ....
commons whose leader of the house of commons whose constituency i have. leader of the house of commons whose constituency i have. . . constituency i have. south northamptonshire. - constituency i have. south l northamptonshire. explained, constituency i have. south - northamptonshire. explained, the courts do not northamptonshire. explained, the courts do not have northamptonshire. explained, the courts do not have jurisdiction - northamptonshire. explained, the| courts do not have jurisdiction over this parliament, and this is to protect parliament, and by extension, our democracy, from being subverted or undermined by outside pressure from the powerful. to portray this inquisitorial procedure as inherently unfair is simply not credible. i think the agenda for getting late in the excellent speech he is making would she agree with me that today is a good day for the house of commons because the system has fundamentally worked. commons because the system has fundamentally worked. ....
Led you to this point? many people have been questioning over the past few months the statements and the actions taken by the attorney general in terms of really upholding the power that he thinks lies in the executive office. well, we re conservatives. we believe in the constitution, we believe in the institutions of the country, and we see those being subverted. most of us, i think, have probably voted republican in every election we ve ever voted in. it s important from the conservative side to speak to the values that we think are what makes america great, not again, but always has made america great, and that we feel a moral and legal imperative to speak in favor of the rule of law. and why do you think, paul, that we re not hearing more republicans, not just on this issue of the attorney general and his actions, but of things we ve heard from this white ....
there s one other big difference, and you alluded to it at the end of your point, jeffrey, which is the complaint of republicans has been that democrats are sore losers and they wanted to reverse the verdict of the last election by relitigating the last election. this is really about trying to preserve the next election and keep it from being subverted. so that makes it a more current issue. yeah. after mueller, nobody is going to say, oh, donald trump, he would never do that. he would never do that. good point. gloria, thank you. jeffrey toobin, david axelrod, appreciate it. just ahead, speaker pelosi s speech today aimed at two people, president trump and the acting director of national intelligence will testify thursday about the whistle-blower complaint. we re going to talk to the former director of national intelligence about all this next. i wonder how the firm is g without its fearless leader. sure you want to leave that all behind? yeah. stay restless, ....
colluding to try to win to try to win the election and then lying about it. right. what is this story? this story is about the president of the united states and a foreign power who by the way is very very mo is in a hostile replace with vladimir putin, putting pressure on him to try to collude to win the 2020 election. so. right. there is a lot of overlap. but you are right this is easier to understand. because mueller never happened. right. there there is one other big difference. and you alluded to it at the end of your point, jefferiy, which is the complaint of republicans has been that democrats are sore losers and they wanted to reverse the verdict of the last election by relitigating the last election. this is really about trying to preserve the next election. that s right. and keep it from being subverted. right. so that makes it a more current issue. ....