nathan. or less i actually did it. and let s look at the evidence. and, there s that bear fruit. or is that something where you look at them and it just doesn t work, because we want to make sure we got the right person. could you have prosecuted nathan? absolutely. absolutely. i mean, it would have been an easy case. really? absolutely. come in and say he did it, he is the boyfriend anytime you have a stabbing, you mediately look to whoever that person s romantically involved with. so we called in nathan yet again. multiple time. actually? too yes. they finally arrived to the same conclusion the police did that neither ashli nor nathan killed shelley, had to beat daniel. daniel alone. but making a case in court, it might not be so easy. this is one of those cases where circumstances are kind,
i mean, we just don t know that. can you explain what they re talking about. i actually have no idea. i mean i know what they say the tapes say that there s some tapes that are in existence that show basically a quid pro quo bribery scandal that involves if they have tapes that show this, that is a really big deal. a huge deal. but they re going off of basically a tip sheet. the fbi creates the report they re referring to. when someone comes to them, they interview them, and they say things. those are not corroborated. those are not factual. those are tips. reporters get a lot of tips that we wouldn t share with the public unless we corroborated them. at some point, katy, we re almost, what are we, six months into this congress. they re going to need to show that their maniacal focus, which is on these investigations, bear fruit. if they keep throwing out allegations, that becomes politically difficult for them? does it?