Certain matters beyond the limits of that policy, but we would like to see that more explicit in a revision. Thank you. I agree with what my fellow commissioners have said. I think that during the time im here the staffs work has given me no doubt that if given discretiona discretionary power, you would [ indiscernible ] from anything the commission intended. I think for the investigation unit, the two driving principles have always been the public trust and transparency. So as long as it is guided by those two, whatever actions you take are then the public will understand. And at the same time, when you look at the enforcement efforts, its largely serving to deter future ill activities. Sometimes when people look at these cases that have gone on for five, six, ten years and with nothing happening, it doesnt give the public much trust. So i think that it is really important to look at the cases you take. And the second thing is there are other cases that come to you that may not fit in
Worship. Welcome, everyone to the four. Im alex savidge. Im alyana gomez. Today, Police Detail the shooting incident and what the suspect was armed with. They say the gunman fired 39 rounds. The matt Gilroy Police officers combine fired 18 miles. They hit the suspect multiple times but the corner says the suspect eventually shot and killed himself. As we know, he was heavily armed. Police say he was carrying a 75 round drum magazine that fit into his gun and also had 5 40 round magazines on his body or near his body and another magazine in his backpack. The fbi also revealed that it is opening a domestic terrorism investigation. Kate abuse Maureen Naylor is live in were with the latest. More rain . Reporter that announcement came as afternoon. The fbi is saying they are classifying this as a domestic terrorism investigation, saying the shooter was exploring violent ideologies and saying he had a list of targets. Tuesday, the fbi announced it is finished collecting evidence from the gil
About whether either of those options make sense or i can continue with other remarks. It seems to me that there i mean, maybe theres a crossing of the two. For example, i think your idea about getting rid of lack of jurisdiction cases immediately makes great sense. Theres no point in dwelling on something lack of jurisdiction it seems to me is fairly bright line. You either have it or you dont. It really doesnt call for a great deal of discretion. So getting rid of those, it seems to me, highly efficient is a way of clearing out cases. Your numbers are showing that. And then perhaps after you do that, then you take whats left and i dont know if theres a diminimus amount that provides response to the request of justice to say that given youve got three investigators and youve got this many complaints, is it in the interest of justice to spend to take one of your investigators and spend time on a matter that might result in a 100 fine . And maybe it doesnt. I dont know if thats an appro
Deal with single occupancy vehicles, how we get private cars to either to certainly reduce their number, electrify those that are there, and thirdly, very important on that private sector of transportation is how do we electrify the dirtiest vehicles, diesel trucks. That is a big task for us to figure out how our asthma corridors, which are related to our transportation corridors which are related to our movement of goods, how we elect reelect electrify that. But certainly, supporting public transportation, getting people out of vehicle, owning our grid, those are the areas that i think were ripe to have leadership and help. Supervisor mandelman thank you, director raphael. I didnt give you the heads up that i was going to ask that. Great answer. But i was hoping for it. Supervisor mandelman i certainly thank you again for sticking with us and for your leadership on these issues with zero waste and waste and construction waste and im done. Thank you. Supervisor safai ill just i didnt w
Be worth revisiting at least . Yeah, were certainly willing to. An open amount. Were certainly willing to revisit it. I think one think about their regulations is they provide certain circumstances by which their Enforcement Division can decide that a particular respondent is ineligible for that schedule, ineligible for the streamlined process. So they dont get the benefit of the 1 modifier. They instead get pumped through the ordinary settlement process, where the penalties might be larger. If we were to undertake a revision of the existing fixed penalty policy, we would ask that the commission approve our ability to do that because the existing policy says that staff is down by that policy until changed by the commission. I mean, our own view has been that there are situations in which we could exclude someone from that policy because we think the policy envisions scenarios that dont require investigation. So we have, in fact, taken certain matters beyond the limits of that policy, b