Was actually dictated by President Trump himself, saying this, we primarily discussed a program about the adoption of russian children. With no mention of dirt on Hillary Clinton. It wasnt until the New York Times was going to break the story that trump junior was promised damaging information on clinton back in july of last year. That was the New York Times reporting. At the time, trump junior and the trump team started changing their tune, saying the promise of damaging information turned into mainly an adoption conversation. They get into the meeting, and it quickly turns a pretext for Russian Adoption, according to his statement. The comments are about any type of information on Hillary Clinton were vague, meaningless. As you can see from the emails, the pretext of the meeting was, hey, we have information. There was some small talk. I dont even remember what it was. It was sort of nonsensical. Then it quickly went on to, you know, a story about Russian Adoption and how we could po
the president? you know, i think essentially the biggest change is hillary clinton is not the democratic nominee for president in 2018. republic remember, donald trump was very unpopular in 2016, but he was facing off against hillary clinton, who was the second most unpopular candidate. without hillary clinton on the ballot, it s all about a referendum on donald j. trump. this is what s going on, and that s the big change, i believe. so was that a big risk for the president to be campaigning for him and for balderson so tod to say, if you want someone who will fight for the president, it goes both ways. yeah, i would say it s somewhat of a mistake. donald trump s numbers in those districts aren t as bad as they are nationally. his approval rating is about equal to his disapproval rating. this is also a district that isn t a donald trump type of republican. it s much more the john kasich type of republican. it s the best-educated district